Reddog1 wrote:
I tried in good faith to offer factual information, with a manufactures recorded data. Kind of makes you think what's the point, misinformation, second guessing, statements without manufactures supporting documentation or resource location will always be offered as gospel.
Except you shot yourself in the foot, and lost all credibility when you made an incorrect conjecture from the factual information presented. In other words, you fell down the same rabbit hole as everyone else.
The debate will rage on, of course with most people, probably myself included, not knowing a darn thing about what we're talking about.
