spoon059 wrote:
toedtoes wrote:
They is the insurance company. And yes, they did find him at fault for the accident because his vehicle was overloaded which was at least the partial cause of the accident. No BS.
Has nothing to do with legal or not, it has to do with liability.
Well, clearly every collision has an "at fault" vehicle. What did finding him "at fault" do to negatively effect him?
What does that have to do with the topic. The point is that there are many considerations to make if you choose to disregard stated weights other than will you get stopped by police.