GM Admits Fudging Payload Ratings
GM Admits Fudging Payload Ratings :E:E:E
Forum Discussion
The more interesting part is why they did it? They could have very easily just raised the GVWR on the vehicles, right?
We argue, excuse me, discuss weights on this forum all the time with some saying GVWR is king and others saying GAWR and tires are king. I have to admit that this lends a little validation to the GVWR argument, as it would have been much easier to simply raise that rating and get a higher payload than to remove items. Of course they could be trying to lower the weight for other reasons, but the article only talked about raising payload. Thoughts?
We argue, excuse me, discuss weights on this forum all the time with some saying GVWR is king and others saying GAWR and tires are king. I have to admit that this lends a little validation to the GVWR argument, as it would have been much easier to simply raise that rating and get a higher payload than to remove items. Of course they could be trying to lower the weight for other reasons, but the article only talked about raising payload. Thoughts?
