GM Admits Fudging Payload Ratings

LarryJM wrote:

azwildcat99 wrote:
The more interesting part is why they did it? They could have very easily just raised the GVWR on the vehicles, right?

We argue, excuse me, discuss weights on this forum all the time with some saying GVWR is king and others saying GAWR and tires are king. I have to admit that this lends a little validation to the GVWR argument, as it would have been much easier to simply raise that rating and get a higher payload than to remove items. Of course they could be trying to lower the weight for other reasons, but the article only talked about raising payload. Thoughts?

You can't just raise the GVWR w/o VERY EXPENSIVE and time consuming Brake certification testing so that a different FMVSS door sticker is allowed.

Larry

You mean there is actually some certifications and testing attached to the GVW figures? I thought the numbers were just made up.
AZWildcat raise a good point, somewhere in all of the misinformation there is actual some real testing and data.