dodge guy wrote:
I wouldn`t worry about it. there is no need for DRL`s. The U.S. decided years ago after extensive testing and reports they didn`t help with accidents. I can see oncoming cars just fine with or without DRL`s. Somehow Canada decided (probably with GM`s input) that they were necessary. GM tried years ago to get the U.S. to buy into it, but said no go. I for one am glad that was never approved.
But if you must have it, they can be programmed by the dealer!
Nope. Canada followed Scandinavia's model when it made DRL's mandatory. GM then petitioned the US govt to adopt them on the Canadian model but were turned down. There have been big changes since that testing was done in 1990. As a matter of fact, very few if any vehicles use the headlights as DRL's anymore. Most new models are now using separate LED's for DRL's and when a turn signal is operating, the DRL on that side goes out so it makes the signal even more noticeable, not less.
North America has always been behind when it comes to making changes in automotive lighting. We were still using tungsten sealed beams ver a decade after Europe went to asymmetric cut-off halogen lights. Thankfully Canada got with the program on this issue at least.