agesilaus wrote:
Those comparisons were not to flying cars or solar panels but to the companies that raised money off those claims then folded once the investors had extracted the maximum amount possible from the scam. Why don't you learn how to read a post for what it says not what you think it says.
I agree, what is being derided is a company that makes outrageous claims about non-existent products, induces people to give them money, and then disappear in the night with no regrets...and also no product either.