New record !

45Ricochet wrote:

Just me but getting a lemon Open Range 5er I certainly wouldn't have a logo for it my signature :E
Corvette pic was much better :B

Sorry...But did I say it was my current Open Range? I don't think so.

I am done with this thread. Actually done with it before this posting. Hope that helps the Mod's head ache. But I just need to correct the above, to avoid mis-communication. This thread is loaded with too much of that already.

45Ricochet wrote:
Sorry Marty,
But I just had to correct erroneous information which was suggested. The following quote
" For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Chrysler Group LLC’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’
second amended complaint is hereby DENIED, without prejudice as to the issues relevant to the
court’s determination of whether Plaintiffs Easterly and Fisher have standing in the context of
class certification to invoke the consumer protection statutes against Defendant in states other
than Missouri. (ECF No. 53.)
IT IS SO ORDERED. "
That doesn't prove guilt, only that the suits at Chrysler where denied dismissal of suit ( only in Missouri non the less) . Typical suit stuff and BYW that artical is also older than a year old. Maybe bring up some current stuff or your nick name might become " Old NewsW "
Nice try though!

Rick,
There's nothing erroneous about this... This issue is still ongoing. There's a firm here in Houston working this issue hot a heavy.

Cummins12V98 wrote:

45Ricochet wrote:
Sorry Marty,
But I just had to correct erroneous information which was suggested. The following quote
" For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Chrysler Group LLC’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’
second amended complaint is hereby DENIED, without prejudice as to the issues relevant to the
court’s determination of whether Plaintiffs Easterly and Fisher have standing in the context of
class certification to invoke the consumer protection statutes against Defendant in states other
than Missouri. (ECF No. 53.)
IT IS SO ORDERED. "
That doesn't prove guilt, only that the suits at Chrysler where denied dismissal of suit ( only in Missouri non the less) . Typical suit stuff and BYW that artical is also older than a year old. Maybe bring up some current stuff or your nick name might become " Old NewsW "
Nice try though!

He is good at using examples of blown head gaskets with deletes and tuners.

The 6.7 Cummins is a very dependable engine and the 07-09 issues have been resolved.

6.7 cummins are the most popular with deletes and it's for a reason.

This guy after he performs his deletes will be faced with a possible head gasket failure.

45Ricochet wrote:
Sorry Marty,
But I just had to correct erroneous information which was suggested. The following quote
" For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Chrysler Group LLC’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’
second amended complaint is hereby DENIED, without prejudice as to the issues relevant to the
court’s determination of whether Plaintiffs Easterly and Fisher have standing in the context of
class certification to invoke the consumer protection statutes against Defendant in states other
than Missouri. (ECF No. 53.)
IT IS SO ORDERED. "
That doesn't prove guilt, only that the suits at Chrysler where denied dismissal of suit ( only in Missouri non the less) . Typical suit stuff and BYW that artical is also older than a year old. Maybe bring up some current stuff or your nick name might become " Old NewsW "
Nice try though!

He is good at using examples of blown head gaskets with deletes and tuners.

The 6.7 Cummins is a very dependable engine and the 07-09 issues have been resolved.

Sorry Marty,
But I just had to correct erroneous information which was suggested. The following quote
" For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Chrysler Group LLC’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’
second amended complaint is hereby DENIED, without prejudice as to the issues relevant to the
court’s determination of whether Plaintiffs Easterly and Fisher have standing in the context of
class certification to invoke the consumer protection statutes against Defendant in states other
than Missouri. (ECF No. 53.)
IT IS SO ORDERED. "
That doesn't prove guilt, only that the suits at Chrysler where denied dismissal of suit ( only in Missouri non the less) . Typical suit stuff and BYW that artical is also older than a year old. Maybe bring up some current stuff or your nick name might become " Old NewsW "
Nice try though!

FishOnOne wrote:

45Ricochet wrote:

Here's a 2.5 minute clip Here

Soooo does she have any updates in the last 18 months :H
Pending means possible lawsuit, nothing more.
Okay I'll give you some help Marty :B as I don't want the dreaded ax to fall :E

So your dismissing there's no issues with the Cummins 6.7 engines because of pending issues:

Link 1

Link 2

Chrysler sounds like a real stand up company... :R

Edit... Double post

45Ricochet wrote:

Here's a 2.5 minute clip Here

Soooo does she have any updates in the last 18 months :H
Pending means possible lawsuit, nothing more.
Okay I'll give you some help Marty :B as I don't want the dreaded ax to fall :E

So your dismissing there's no issues with the Cummins 6.7 engines because of pending issues:

Link 1

Link 2

Chrysler sounds like a real stand up company... :R

The sad part every time the check engine light came on the owners felt a little lighter in the rear pocket... I know my BIL dumped his 09 after ~ 9 months of ownership when he was getting stuck with some of the repair bills which he was being told he was idling the truck too much causing the soot build up and clogging the turbo/dpf. He dumped that POS and purchased a 5.9 powered truck.

Some of you hae hit some of the headache on the head! A few yrs ago when I first joined the forum, ie about 201, there were maybe at best 6000 reg members....the gm 6.5td was the motor to avoid per say.....then the 6.0 problems started, then 6.4, now the HPFP threads.........

ALso why I have the diesel vs gas sticky, keeps that issue sorta kinda at bay, as it gives me an excuse to say read that, nothing new in the G vs D arena overall since I started it, other than fuel prices. Both have plus and minus's.

Same with the GM vs Ford vs Dodge vs _______, or tire brands or manual vs auto....

SHall I name a few more constant question issues, some are good, some are bad......

Time to go move teh boat from one marina to another, then tomorrow decorate it up like a Hawaian Luau, do a parade saturday for seattles opening boating day celebration........

Maybe I will not have a headache by the end of the day saturday......yeah right! HIC!:B:B

Marty

Again, glad that someone is telling 'us' about the issue....whereas someone with
a $70K POS does not, fixed himself, but that is not what I'm talking about

Sure for someone who has the ability, facilities, time and $$$$ to DIY, but the
vast majority does NOT and will suffer from not knowing or having the information
available if they search for it

There are folks who believe in all the marketing verbiage and will spend tens
of thousands of $$$$'s

Take one of my sister's BF's. Lawyer and masters in lit. Dumb @ss is being kind

Windshield flyer $79 out the door, 4 wheel brake job. Told that fool that I could
NOT buy just the parts for that

Turned out they put the calipers in upside down (left on right, right on left)
of their Turbo Volvo and nearly killed my nephew when he drove it

He took them to small claims, where they paid but did NOT admit to any wrong doing

Wonder how many folks have their vehicle brakes screwed by that shop and don't
know it...that is what I'm talking about

Here's a 2.5 minute clip Here

Soooo does she have any updates in the last 18 months :H
Pending means possible lawsuit, nothing more.
Okay I'll give you some help Marty :B as I don't want the dreaded ax to fall :E