intheburbs wrote:
McDonoughDawg wrote:
Properly designed crumple zone absorb energy and dissipate it much better than a big hunk of steel...but some of you continue on with your feelings about the more steel the better.
Yes, I'll take my bigger hunk of steel AND properly designed crumple zones. I like to have my cake, and eat it, too. My truck weighs 6500 lbs - I'll let my daughter drive that, instead of a Fiat 500 or Beetle.
Turtle n Peeps wrote:
You might want to rethink your statement. :)
This video is pointless. Where's the picture of the bunny with a pancake on his head? A 55 year-old car doesn't fare as well in a crash as a brand-new car? Holy crap! That's headline news! Where are Joan Claybrook and Ralph Nader?
LOL, aaaaaaaaa as you can see from the title of this thread, your big hunk of SUV steel did not do too well in crash tests now did it. Only 2 of 9 passed the test.
