Forum Discussion
131 Replies
- NC_HaulerExplorer
wnjj wrote:
Huntindog wrote:
Bedlam wrote:
So now we are talking about modified trucks?
Maybe some us had really well performing SRW's that the delta between them and DRW is not that much. My F250 with modified suspension and 19.5" wheels did extremely well with the weight it hauled plus towing weight behind it. Now that I have DRW, the biggest change I feel is how the heavier stock spring pack handles the same weight verses my modified suspension.
SO SPEND SOME MONEY ON YOUR DUALLY AND MODIFY IT!!
Oh thats right, there is no need.:B
You missed the point completely. His point was the suspension system on the DRW is the primary reason why they "feel" more stable. Unless you're actually to the point of almost rolling your rig, the width isn't so important. A wider stance just means less force is needed at the tire(s) to prevent tilting. A strong single tire at a narrow stance can certainly resist tilting as well as a weaker one(s) at a wide stance but most would not like riding on that firm of a tire.
So if you have the same wheels and tires on both trucks, all with same air pressure, where those that put your analogy, ??? It's not JUST the suspension....the WIDER WIDTH of the truck will stabilize what is setting above it, (very basic physics).. It's not OBVIOUS "tilting", it's cornering and less sway with what is setting over the truck, which help the rest of the 5er track a little better....It's not like the difference in "night" and "day", it's just enough difference with a heavier, high profile 5er, towing on mountainous, curvy roads that one would tell a difference....I did, and it wasn't because I "wanted to believe it"...it is what it is and the MAJORITY of the people that normally reply to these post will agree with what I've said... The majority, and I said majority, that have actually owned and towed with both will agree that the dually offers a more stable towing experience, (and some, like me have been able to compare towing the same unit over the same terrain to see and feel it first hand..not just hear say, one way or the other).
Do the search on this forum or any other camping forum and see what you come up with. Or do a Poll on this forum... - AH64IDExplorer
TakingThe5th wrote:
You don't really need scientific studies, just take a dually on a test drive and see how much better it takes the turns and curves. It becomes obvious.
So a DRW has an effect on suspension?
Suspension on a pickup is the #1 limiting factor in a corner, unless you are on a slalom course and pushing the tires to their max.
On 2 similar trucks (suspension/frame/etc) I have yet to notice a difference in cornering with training wheels.Cummins12V98 wrote:
I don't need no stinking study to tell me what I know from EXPERIENCE!
Just to clarify, you have towed the same load with a SRW?
I know you haven't, simply based on your pin weight :-) The sheer weight of your MS camper will also help it's stability.
Experience is hard to quantify if only one way has been tried. Not saying you haven't done both, just in general.
I have no experience towing a 8000lb 30' TT with a 1/2 ton, but having done it with a 1 ton in the mountains I know I don't want to try. I have only experience 1/2 of the comparison, so my experience doesn't lend to an unbiased opinion.
I can tow with a 35-40 mph side wind on a SRW with a TT and be rock solid at 70. I have also driven 35' Class C's with a 25 mph side wind and thought I was going to get blown off the road at 60 (thou Ford steering leaves a LOT to be desired).BenK wrote:
Common sense is very UN-common...
stand with both feet touching and have someone push you sideways
Again with feet wide apart
Which one will have that person pushing you sideways easier?
But...this is a common sense topic, so tough to get common sense into the
discussion...
Yes, but it's not apples to apples.. well not granny smiths to granny smiths.
A SRW and a DRW have the same spring width, and in many application the same base leaf pack. With properly inflated tires there is more suspension deflection than tire deflection.
To make the analogy the same you would have to tell the person to keep their legs the same width apart, but widen their footprint. So stand with your toes pointing at 12 and get a push at the shoulders. Then point your toes to 3 and 9 and get the same push. There will be less movement, but nothing like your example.
Yes the additional 4 sidewalls make a huge difference in tire stability, and for some loads they are an absolute requirement. I am not discounting a DRW when the circumstances require it, but DRW owners are generally over the top with their examples. Even differences in SRW tires can make a HUGE difference.
Look at your load and use.. it should tell you if a DRW is right for you.
Sometimes a DRW just wont work based on use, so a HD SRW can be modified to meet the needs that an OEM SRW won't supply and go places a DRW can't.
An actual test would be interesting to read, thou I am not sure how to make it very accurate??
With the same loads a SRW could be at 100% of tire capacity and a DRW at 66% of RAWR capacity, but only 50% of tire capacity. That's not a apples to apples test, so it's hard to quantify and get fair results. This is the same reason many people who go from SRW to DRW feel an instant and very quantifiable results.. 2 tires at 100% load or 4 tires at 50% load.
So how about a test where each one is at 50% of it's load, or 75%? Even then the 4 additional sidewalls are going to provide improved tire stability.
One could widen the rear stance of a SRW to match the outers of a DRW, but you would still get better DRW performance based on sidewall numbers.
Personally I don't think it's the width that matters as much as the sidewalls, since the springs are at the same width.
Tires also create a different feeling for the driver. Suspension and tire deflection feel very different, and tire deflection always feels bigger than it is, IME. - wnjjExplorer II
Huntindog wrote:
Bedlam wrote:
So now we are talking about modified trucks?
Maybe some us had really well performing SRW's that the delta between them and DRW is not that much. My F250 with modified suspension and 19.5" wheels did extremely well with the weight it hauled plus towing weight behind it. Now that I have DRW, the biggest change I feel is how the heavier stock spring pack handles the same weight verses my modified suspension.
SO SPEND SOME MONEY ON YOUR DUALLY AND MODIFY IT!!
Oh thats right, there is no need.:B
You missed the point completely. His point was the suspension system on the DRW is the primary reason why they "feel" more stable. Unless you're actually to the point of almost rolling your rig, the width isn't so important. A wider stance just means less force is needed at the tire(s) to prevent tilting. A strong single tire at a narrow stance can certainly resist tilting as well as a weaker one(s) at a wide stance but most would not like riding on that firm of a tire. - HuntindogExplorer
valhalla360 wrote:
It's about standards.RinconVTR wrote:
valhalla360 wrote:
RinconVTR wrote:
Take the stability of 2 rear tires and multiply by two...give or take.
OP, am we missing something? Is there a hidden question here?
Wow, not even close to reality. By this logic is we fit the entire length of the axle with tires (say 8 tires) it will be 8 times as stable (it's not).
The answer is yes, dually's are more stable but as long as you are within weight ratings, there is no safety issue. SRW trucks don't fall over because they are missing the training wheels. You would be very hard pressed to document a situation where a SRW would roll but a dually would stay upright while towing.
I suggest you start watching semi's. You will notice a great many are going singles (a little difference as the outside width is held steady). If they were falling over left and right, trucking companies wouldn't use them. That is about as objective as you can get on the subject.
The reason to get dually's is because you need the extra load capacity.
Question was about stability...not load...not safety...stay on topic. You answered the question yourself...but yet you go on.
If you look at the trucks converting from dual to single tires, they are not carrying the highest loads and the single tire is VERY wide. VERY WIDE! Now why would they do that? Hmmmm
Also stability while towing...IMO...does not mean resistance to tip over. Roller over "stability" I don't believe was the point of discussion here, but if it was, I'd simply take measure. The wider version likely wins. And is that not the dually?
Safety was implicit in the question. If the OP wasn't concerned with safety, what would be the point of the question?
To end it as yes, it's stable and ignore the fact that there is no distinguishable benefits (other than load ratings), would be highly misleading, so I took the liberty of adding to the discussion.
Supersingle truck tires are very wide. They are very wide so they can handle heavy loads not to make the truck more stable. I brought it up because there were misleading posts that more than one tire is intrinsically more stable.
True, stability could be in reference to either roll overs or the trailer pushing the back of the truck around:
- For roll over, there is an improvement but as stated, there's not a problem with SRW trucks towing 5th wheels falling over. The impact while towing is negligible and well within safe operating parameters.
- For stability in reference to the trailer pushing the rear of the truck around, there is even less effect (not that 5th wheels typcially have an issue with this anyway). There may be a couple hundred pounds from the extra tires, axle length and such but overall the weight planted on the rear axle but it's going to be pretty close to the same for a similarly outfitted rig. Available traction is a function of the coefficent of friction and the force pressing the wheels to the ground. If they are the same, there would be no additional stability. Any negligible difference could be made up by throwing some extra weight in the truck bed.
So my initial answer still stands. There is a difference but not enough to matter.
Some people are perfectly happy with a less than ideal setup... And not just in this discussion about trucks either... All the way down to the guy towing with a Prius.
If you are happy with your setup, then I guess I am happy for you. - HuntindogExplorer
Bedlam wrote:
So now we are talking about modified trucks?
Maybe some us had really well performing SRW's that the delta between them and DRW is not that much. My F250 with modified suspension and 19.5" wheels did extremely well with the weight it hauled plus towing weight behind it. Now that I have DRW, the biggest change I feel is how the heavier stock spring pack handles the same weight verses my modified suspension.
SO SPEND SOME MONEY ON YOUR DUALLY AND MODIFY IT!!
Oh thats right, there is no need.:B - NC_HaulerExplorer
valhalla360 wrote:
NC Hauler wrote:
I've towed the same 5er over the same terrain with a 1 ton SRW truck and the dually...99% of my towing is on mountainous, curvy roads in NC, SC, TN, VA and WVa....Running at the same speeds, the dually, in my opinion, handled my 5er in a more stable manner on the curvy, mountainous sections of the roads..just seemed, (to me), to handle the load a little better....I have a high profile 5er loaded to 16,300#.
Driving on flatland, guess it might not matter, but in windy conditions, seems the towing experience seems to be a little more stable....Again, going by my own personal experience. And it should be obvious, as stated above that the "wide tracking" in the rear that the dually provides, will help with a more stable ride...I personally purchased my first dually in 05' because of weight of a 5er I was towing...not necessarily for anything else, BUT, after towing the same roads with the same unit and then hooking up to a dually, THEN, I became convinced that it offered a more stable towing experience...but again, I'd say it would depend on how heavy you're towing and WHERE you're towing. In my case, and my opinion, with my 5er, I prefer the dually for where I do most of my towing.
What you describe is more about stiffer suspension than extra wheels.
Sorry, not buying into THAT is all it is...has nothing to do with the wider stance in the back compared to a narrower stance with a SRW truck????.(side to side stability with pin weight and that part of 5er setting over a wider truck, (just physics)...sorry, I disagree with you...my 2500 handled the 14,500# 5er I was towing it with...sure the 3500 DRW truck has a heavier spring pack, but it's rear stance is different, guess it's so obvious,some tend to ignore 4 wheels and a wider stance, versus two wheels, and narrower stance in the rear...believe what you want to, but the "wide tracking" also plays into cornering when towing uphill and down hill, ESS turn after ESS turn on secondary mountainous curvy roads in the mountains of WV, TN, VA and NC....Don't have the "sway"....you don't want to believe it, then believe what you want and I know what I know. - BedlamModeratorMaybe some us had really well performing SRW's that the delta between them and DRW is not that much. My F250 with modified suspension and 19.5" wheels did extremely well with the weight it hauled plus towing weight behind it. Now that I have DRW, the biggest change I feel is how the heavier stock spring pack handles the same weight verses my modified suspension.
- Cummins12V98Explorer IIIFunny these Threads are usually all about the same!
You have the guys that have towed with a SRW and a now have a DRW and know by their experience the Dually is a more stable platform when it's really needed.
Then you have the guys that have a SRW that know they should have a DRW and make every excuse in the world not to have one. It won't fit in my garage, It won't go thru Starbucks drive thru, too many tires to buy, won't fit in the parking spots right next to the store, the wide butt is ugly just to name a few!
Of course all JMHO! - valhalla360Navigator
The Mad Norsky wrote:
There is a forum member who uses the user name Veebyes.
Driving through Wyoming somewhere near Laramie on I-80 pulling their fifth wheel with dually truck, they got hit with a huge side burst of wind.
The kingpin of the fifth wheel was torn out of the hitch in the box and the fifth wheel ended up rolling down an embankment, destroying itself in the process.
The fifth wheel dragged the truck some over towards the shoulder of the road before the kingpin tore loose, but the truck stayed upright.
Veebyes has stated he believes the dual's prevented the truck from following the fifth wheel on down the embankment and rolling too.
Anecdotal, yes, but had this operator had a single rear wheel vehicle, would the results have been the same??????
Probably yes. It's a thin line between both would stay upright or both would roll over.
To claim that during one panic situation, he had any realistic clue that it was the dually's that made the difference is just silly. - valhalla360Navigator
NC Hauler wrote:
I've towed the same 5er over the same terrain with a 1 ton SRW truck and the dually...99% of my towing is on mountainous, curvy roads in NC, SC, TN, VA and WVa....Running at the same speeds, the dually, in my opinion, handled my 5er in a more stable manner on the curvy, mountainous sections of the roads..just seemed, (to me), to handle the load a little better....I have a high profile 5er loaded to 16,300#.
Driving on flatland, guess it might not matter, but in windy conditions, seems the towing experience seems to be a little more stable....Again, going by my own personal experience. And it should be obvious, as stated above that the "wide tracking" in the rear that the dually provides, will help with a more stable ride...I personally purchased my first dually in 05' because of weight of a 5er I was towing...not necessarily for anything else, BUT, after towing the same roads with the same unit and then hooking up to a dually, THEN, I became convinced that it offered a more stable towing experience...but again, I'd say it would depend on how heavy you're towing and WHERE you're towing. In my case, and my opinion, with my 5er, I prefer the dually for where I do most of my towing.
What you describe is more about stiffer suspension than extra wheels.
About Travel Trailer Group
44,046 PostsLatest Activity: Aug 01, 2025