Gr8life wrote:
Licensing requirements (taxes) are the reason for the dual GVWR ratings. Has nothing to do with GVWR or RAWR. Completely irrelevant to the discussion.
You're probably more correct in some ways than others. Others are more correct.
Yes, you could put a 8K rated dual tired axel under an S-10, Ranger or equal, Toyota used to put a dual axel under there 4banger rigs. You could maybe get the s10 recertified to show it could handle the weight. Reality is, the scale guys probably would not care, as long as your PAID for gvw was greater than the actual gvw. Along with you are under the road bed max weight limits.
As I said earlier, there is more than one way to look at this, one has to know ALL of the legal and non legal ways of looking at this issue. For me, as I stated earlier, as long as I am under the road bed limits, have a paid for license that is over what I am going down the road at. I am legal. Not necessarily "safe", but I am legal!
"Safe" certainly has many connotations too. I've driven over gvwr, gcwr with my family of 6 in a given truck or two or three. The only white knuckle issues have had to do with other issues, not weight related. Like the 35 15-20 passenger vans coming the opposite direction I was going on a 1.5 lane width mountain road. I was on the cliff side! I really do not see how gvwr/gcwr has to do with these kind of situations.
There is not right or wrong, other than to a degree, the person in the scale shack, and maybe the person doing an accident report after the fact.
Marty