RAM 3500 Frame Failure/Eagle Cap Camper

KD4UPL wrote:
I don't know why anyone would expect warranty coverage as it's obviously overloaded. The owner was not only ignorant of the truck's payload but couldn't give anything other than a ballpark estimate of it's loaded weight. Further, just because a truck has a certain payload it still must be distributed correctly on the axles. A responsible truck camper owner would have a scale ticket or two to prove axle a d total weights. I always did when I ran my Chevy dually over it's GVWR with a TC.

Campers that extend beyond the bed have been around for decades. I don't know what they weighed way back then but almost certainly heavier than the GVW of the trucks they were put in at the time. While I don't disagree with the positioning of the load to achieve a GVW matters, I don't think it mattered as much then due to overbuild, things used to be designed with P for plenty on the end numbers. I doubt that happens much if at all anymore. RAM builds that truck for a certain weight in a certain configuration with little "P for Plenty". This type of load certainly isn't typical and likely not accounted for, hence the failure. You see these slide ins all over. Perhaps all not as big as this one, but they are out there. If there was an issue with all of them putting a truck over GVW, the internet would be full of pictures like this. Doesn't appear that they are. RAM will likely walk away from this without paying. But clearly RAM has some shortcomings. There are companies here that have snapped RAM frames. The well drillers down the road from me for one. They don't buy them anymore.