Forum Discussion
Travlingman
Sep 03, 2017Explorer II
4x4ord wrote:brulaz wrote:
Fuel Economy results on the dyno are pretty weird;
don't seem to correspond with real world.
:h
It's unbelievable to me that they would publish those numbers without first understanding the reason for the mistake.
They said they ran the test twice because they thought the 1st time was wrong. The test still doesn't make sense. That is one huge difference for the GM when the Ford and Ram came out the same. I know the Ford and Ram had 4.10's and the GM 3.73's, but gearing ain't going to make that much difference.
About Travel Trailer Group
44,052 PostsLatest Activity: Sep 11, 2014