Jan-17-2015 09:00 PM
Jan-22-2015 06:41 AM
smlranger wrote:
We owned a Journey for 8 years, a 2002 so not with the more up to date features of the newer Journey's. It was a good coach but the Journey is not on the level in terms of overall build quality and features as the higher end rigs made by Country Coach, Monaco, Travel Supreme, Entegra, Newmar and others. The greatest weakness, IMO, of the Journey is it is a rear radiator coach. That seems to be no issue for many but it can become an expensive issue if/when you need to do some work on the engine. Even simple tasks like changing a belt or hoses are difficult and expensive on rear radiator coaches. Hard for you if you are doing the work and expensive if you are paying someone else. Before you buy a coach, raise the engine hatch and see for yourself. With a rear radiator coach, you can't even see the motor from the hatch.... think about working on it.
Jan-22-2015 06:18 AM
Jan-22-2015 06:10 AM
Jan-21-2015 06:59 PM
Pico2011 wrote:
these Winn Journeys have very nice modern woodwork in them..very nice. Thanks Rail! anything mechanical I should look for?
Jan-21-2015 10:16 AM
wolfe10 wrote:Pico2011 wrote:
no air brakes? is that good or bad handling wise?
Here is a copy of the reply I posted to that exact question recently on the Alpine forum:
No clear "one is better"-- could easily turn into a "Chevy" vs "Ford" debate.
The reason most DP's have air brakes has nothing to do with their superiority/inferiority. The axles under most DP's are pretty much "off the shelf" truck components. Trucks use air brakes because it a LOT easier to connect/disconnect air lines from truck to trailer than to connect/disconnect and them bleed the air out of the connection on a hydraulic system.
Air brakes are used on vehicles over 100,000 pounds. But, hydraulic brakes are used on jets weighing in just under 1 MILLION pounds (and going a LOT faster).
There are some better designed air brakes vs standard-- same for hydraulic. The best hydraulic use 4 piston fixed calipers, so the pads are pressed against the disk evenly and are much better at retracting than floating caliper designs where the "lazy side" often hangs up, particularly on RV applications where rust can build up in the slide area. Beginning about 2001, Alpine used the 4 piston calipers.
Hydraulic brakes need slightly different "care and feeding" than air brakes. Main Preventive Maintenance is to change the brake fluid every couple of years-- no big deal.
I have had coaches with both, and would not use it as a criteria for ruling in/out a coach. Others may have stronger feelings.
Jan-21-2015 09:55 AM
Jan-21-2015 09:40 AM
Jan-21-2015 08:40 AM
Jan-21-2015 08:13 AM
Jan-21-2015 07:31 AM
Pico2011 wrote:
no air brakes? is that good or bad handling wise?
Jan-21-2015 06:35 AM
Jan-21-2015 06:34 AM
tankcj wrote:
Alpine is another nice coach...
http://www.rvonline.com/single-ad.asp?Recnumber=63717
Jan-21-2015 05:18 AM
Jan-21-2015 01:54 AM
Jan-20-2015 05:01 PM