msmith1199 wrote:
The reason most insurance companies total out a flooded vehicle is because they are on the hook for any future damage related to the flood on the same claim. Things that work now may quit working in a few months and it gets expensive for the insurance company to keep paying to have things fixed. So they often total the vehicle and sell it at auction to recoup some of their loss, but once it's sold at auction it's no longer their problem. I sure as heck would not want to keep a vehicle that had been flooded and would be strongly encouraging my insurance company to total it.
Unless the check has a statement where you endorse the check absolving the insurance company of any related future claims, which is pretty common nowadays.
I would push hard for the insurance company to deal with it (and likely total it). I wouldn't do anything else under their instruction except tell them where it is and that you want them to take care of it. The owner shouldn't be driving it from place to place and researching repair facilities - not on a rig that expensive. That's what insurance is for.
I restored a fresh-water, flood-totaled Cadillac DTS myself. I have to say that I never had any real problems with it. It was completely submerged and sat for months before I picked it up. I paid salvage value for it, though, so I could have walked away from it at any time should it have failed. After seeing first hand what happens when things are under water I wouldn't want to have anything to do with an RV that I had paid 6-figures for. You can't imagine where the water flows and what it leaves behind.
And I didn't see an answer to the fresh or salt water question. If it's saltwater, they should have totaled it no questions asked.