โAug-15-2004 01:22 AM
โFeb-25-2009 12:08 PM
โFeb-25-2009 11:35 AM
โFeb-25-2009 11:17 AM
โFeb-25-2009 10:34 AM
โFeb-25-2009 09:18 AM
โFeb-25-2009 07:02 AM
โFeb-25-2009 06:43 AM
โFeb-25-2009 02:20 AM
โFeb-24-2009 06:02 PM
Griff in Fairbanks wrote:Griff, I'm not sure I trust the auto hobby here at DM... Last time I was there they didn't understand that you don't need to open up the rear end of a 70's era LTD to remove a rear axle. Of course they same guys tried to press out the bearing on that axle without wrapping it in rags too. I corrected them and saved a few ankles when the bearing came apart.
Kendas - I usually have the folks in the hobby shop hook up their engine analyzer when I'm tweaking the carb. (On-post and on-base auto hobby shops are one of the advantages to being a military retiree.) They don't like dragging the analyzer out but do it to get me to stop cussing and swearing.
Personally, I believe the simplest design that works is best. I'd chuck the TQ and replace it with an Edelbrock.
โFeb-24-2009 04:17 PM
โFeb-24-2009 02:12 PM
โFeb-24-2009 02:10 PM
Spectramac wrote:
The hot ticket to pass emissions up here was always to pull the pcv valve out of the valve cover. As long as they didn't have to do an under hood check it worked like a charm.
โFeb-24-2009 01:54 PM
steve93101 wrote:
360 vs 440 Gas Mileage?
The owner claims 12 miles per gallon.Is that realistic, seems like B.S. to me.
Anyway , looking at similar Dodge B300 late 70's early 80's RV's. wonder if a 360 engine would get a little bit better MPG. If it matters I will not be towing.Anyone have personal experience and care to comment on what kind of MPG they get?
โFeb-24-2009 11:05 AM
โFeb-24-2009 10:44 AM