bigfatguy wrote:
Thanks, all, for an entertaining answer to my question.
My wife and I are determined to find out just how small of an RV we can travel in without killing each other, our next trip will be in a rented Roadtrek class B.
Durability is, indeed one of my concerns with regards to a slide-out... not just in the stuck-out-and-can't-drive-away sense, but we do like the idea of an RV that can handle some rough roads and has 4x4 drive, even if we don't take it into what would normally be called "off-road"...
I had not thought of the weight penalty for a slide, I didn't realize it was as much as 500lbs per slide! (what can I say, I'm an electrical engineer... mechanical stuff scares me)
Thanks, again.
I'm glad you stuck with us through all of this!
I'm an EE too, but learned at lot of mechanical stuff from my dad. He taught me that what we see with our eyes may not be the whole story and to basically look beyond the obvious to make sure that KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) is being applied to the maximum extent possible. My graduate studies taught me about the inter-relationships between the components of any system and the statistical implications of how reliability is negatively affected by each added layer of complexity to any system.
Regarding getting along in a small RV with or without slides. The DW and myself bought kindof a small RV - a 24 foot Class C - but it is what I call a "full width" RV. The industry calls it a "widebody" RV. Ours is about 101 inches wide (the same as most Class A motorhomes), so it not having a slide is not as noticeable as the narrower Class C and Class B units. For awhile my BIL had a Mercedes/Sprinter based Interstate model (made by Airstream) Class B+ that was a generous length, at 24 feet, but was real confining inside because of it's narrow width. That rig really needed a slide or more base coach width.
There's a lot to keep in mind when shopping for just the right RV. Good luck in your shopping attempt to "buy it right .. the first time". :)