Thread closure

[K3WE]

...at random.

...without explanation.

Bad practice.

[Bumpyroad]

JoeChiOhki wrote:

K3WE wrote:
...at random.

...without explanation.

Bad practice.

It's worse in ATC, almost not worth responding to a thread if it's in that section, normally, I don't go there if I can help it, but sometimes when I'm bored I'll go, though I wish I could just block the whole section, much like how you can hide threads, then the temptation would be gone.

it is blocked, or at least it doesn't show up under newest posts. I wish it did.
bumpy

[JoeChiOhki]

K3WE wrote:
...at random.

...without explanation.

Bad practice.

It's worse in ATC, almost not worth responding to a thread if it's in that section, normally, I don't go there if I can help it, but sometimes when I'm bored I'll go, though I wish I could just block the whole section, much like how you can hide threads, then the temptation would be gone.

[ANewCreation]

Artemus Gordon wrote:
Ok let's see if this works "how do you feel about "Tea Parties"! That should do it ?

That is too funny and sure to get this thread closed! :B

[mark5w]

Tea parties are for sissies.

I rather go to Dunkin Donuts.:S

[Artemus_Gordon]

Ok let's see if this works "how do you feel about "Tea Parties"! That should do it ?

[capndan77]

Isn't it about time to move on to the things that are important to RVing? Has anyone paid any attention to the amount of discussion this one "non-RVing" topic has generated? Nearly 5 times any other and still no real agreement. And there won't be. I'm sure a moderator tries his or her best but still has to make decisions based on viewpoint. It's obvious that no one who has commented here could be any fairer since we all have varying attitudes and would moderate from our own views.

[SolidAxleDurang]

Francesca Knowles wrote:

K3WE wrote:

I think total secrecy has everything to do with being weasely.

:B

If you say so, Anonymous Screen Name person...

Actually, his screen name is VERY non-anonymous.... I knew his real name and location within seconds of searching.

Only slightly less non-anonymous than yours.

[Bumpyroad]

Francesca Knowles wrote:

K3WE wrote:

I think total secrecy has everything to do with being weasely.

:B

If you say so, Anonymous Screen Name person...

now I don't care who you are.
that one was funny. 🙂
bumpy

[pitch]

I don't want the freakin WILD WEST like some forums are. Even you have to admit that some of the moderators are way over the top. The fact that they volunteer has absolutely nothing to do with it. If it is to burdensome for them to at least supply some measure of consistency between themselves and the various forums on this board, maybe they should consider another hobby.

[Francesca_Knowl]

K3WE wrote:

I think total secrecy has everything to do with being weasely.

:B

If you say so, Anonymous Screen Name person...

[JJBIRISH]

K3WE wrote:

JJBIRISH wrote:
it has nothing to do with if we agree with how they do it…

I think total secrecy has everything to do with being weasely.

While I respect your opinion, I don’t agree with it… IMHO I don’t even believe secrecy would be a qualified term to use…

this is volunteered time and I bet they too have better things to do with most of their time than editing and deleting content that just don’t belong… I am certain with many threads the non-relevant may exceed the relevant, and reviewing the constantly redundant content with no new information the time comes to close…

[SolidAxleDurang]

And I'm sure my post will get modified or deleted.

[SolidAxleDurang]

K3WE wrote:

JJBIRISH wrote:
it has nothing to do with if we agree with how they do it…

I think total secrecy has everything to do with being weasely.

Weasely is a nice word for it.... I call it (and have many times before) chicken****.

[K3WE]

JJBIRISH wrote:
it has nothing to do with if we agree with how they do it…

I think total secrecy has everything to do with being weasely.