cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

Battery Choice Opinion Please UPDATE

BFL13
Explorer II
Explorer II
Updated 26 April
----------

Thinking of getting one of these to replace an old pair of wet 6s, where the price here is similar to new 6s.

Not sure if it is suitable for RV use doing 50-90s sometimes but mostly 75-100s. Is it really a deep cycle? Some graphs etc scroll down. Also is this anything like those big AGMs like Mr Wiz and PT have (although theirs are not the same as each other's ISTR-something about starved or whatever acid? )

I see their spec charging voltage is fairly low at 14.1-14.4. I have 12v deep cycle AGMs in 27 format that want 14.8ish. But their float voltages are the same at 13.7ish.

Thanks for any info/advice

http://www.esg100.com/index.php/product/index/g/e/id/35.html
1. 1991 Oakland 28DB Class C
on Ford E350-460-7.5 Gas EFI
Photo in Profile
2. 1991 Bighorn 9.5ft Truck Camper on 2003 Chev 2500HD 6.0 Gas
See Profile for Electronic set-ups for 1. and 2.
39 REPLIES 39

MEXICOWANDERER
Explorer
Explorer
First order of the day. Find out where the "wall" is

Charge at 14.0, 14.1, 14.2, 14.3, 14.4, 14.5

When you move to the next higher step and the battery refuses the voltage the prior step is the correct one the finish absorbsion voltage. This has to be done before the battery ages.

A refusal would some amperage for a few seconds then back to no amps.

BFL13
Explorer II
Explorer II
Thanks all. Private sale. I went ahead and got one, but taking some risk it is any good. It is unused but not new. He said I could return it if it didn't pass my initial checks. It was at 13.04 sitting there. I will soon know if it is ok.

Advice noted not to use it for my big inverter draws. Intended to just run normal RV 12v stuff--say furnace and a couple lights under 20 amp.

Once it is installed in the RV it will stay there! ๐Ÿ™‚ It is a monster.
1. 1991 Oakland 28DB Class C
on Ford E350-460-7.5 Gas EFI
Photo in Profile
2. 1991 Bighorn 9.5ft Truck Camper on 2003 Chev 2500HD 6.0 Gas
See Profile for Electronic set-ups for 1. and 2.

MEXICOWANDERER
Explorer
Explorer
You can lift 150lb?

Silly Rabbit! That's why they make 18 year olds.

landyacht318
Explorer
Explorer
Looks like another rebranding of the UPG battery to me, but who really knows if the internals are the same.

Look up the 8d UPG battery and compare specs.

Seems you like the paired UPG 27's you have.

Regarding the AGm and thin plates, I am close to the 800 deep cycle range on my Northstar and at least a hundred of those are below 50% SOC and many of those are down to as low as 25% SOC

But Northstar is no Budget thin plate battery.
If I take 45 of its 90AH original rating, at twice the 4.5 amp rate at which it earned its rating, the voltage still rebounds to well over 12.2v with loads removed, and it can still easily start my engine depleted 65 of its 90AH.

2oldman
Explorer II
Explorer II
You can lift 150lb?
"If I'm wearing long pants, I'm too far north" - 2oldman

MEXICOWANDERER
Explorer
Explorer
Read the specs. Opinion

  • Weight versus ampere hours 20 hour weight
  • No where near the weight of a standard 8-D AGM
  • Yet is advertises similar ampere hours
  • Must have THIN plates
  • 100 amp max limit recharge OK. Observe 20% minimum recharge
  • Can your solar exceed 48 amperes continuous?
  • I would never take a thin plate AGM to less than 50% SOC regularly. Over-amp really thin plates and they will warp
  • This is a standby battery. Low charge and discharge amperes
  • This is not a bad choice -- but I would pay attention to the caveats

BFL13
Explorer II
Explorer II
Thanks, do you think the specs with their "cycle use" and also "standby use" indicate that it can be used as a deep cycle battery
EDIT--ok was answered-thanks.
1. 1991 Oakland 28DB Class C
on Ford E350-460-7.5 Gas EFI
Photo in Profile
2. 1991 Bighorn 9.5ft Truck Camper on 2003 Chev 2500HD 6.0 Gas
See Profile for Electronic set-ups for 1. and 2.

MrWizard
Moderator
Moderator
I looked at the specs, the idea is similar but the power specs and chemistry are a little different
The more lead per amphr, the better
Examples
Car jar 63# 105 amp hrs. 0.6 pound of lead per Amphrs , thin plates

Gc pair 126# 220 Amphrs , 0.57 pound of lead per amphr, put thicker plates

This battery 148.8# 250 amp hrs. 0.59 pound of lead lead per amphr, should be thicker plates, size of to gc in one pkg

My battery 102# 135 amp hrs. 0.75 pound of lead per amphr

I think "acid starved" is more lead , less acid per amphr rating

Granted my calculations are based on total weight, which includes the plastic case and the acid,
Mfg don't publish the weight of the lead, in the battery

I think this would perform about the same as two GC, maybe slightly better, being they are AGM
I can explain it to you.
But I Can Not understand it for you !

....

Connected using T-Mobile Home internet and Visible Phone service
1997 F53 Bounder 36s

BFL13
Explorer II
Explorer II
luvlabs wrote:
Good old 220 amp/hr golf cart deep cycle batteries work very well. Splurge and get yourself a battery watering system. Still cheaper than AGMs.


In my particular case the price is temporarily about the same as a pair of new 6s for about the same AH (250). Problem is whether one 6GFM250 would perform about the same as a pair of 6s before grabbing one before they are gone.
1. 1991 Oakland 28DB Class C
on Ford E350-460-7.5 Gas EFI
Photo in Profile
2. 1991 Bighorn 9.5ft Truck Camper on 2003 Chev 2500HD 6.0 Gas
See Profile for Electronic set-ups for 1. and 2.

luvlabs
Explorer
Explorer
Good old 220 amp/hr golf cart deep cycle batteries work very well. Splurge and get yourself a battery watering system. Still cheaper than AGMs.
2017 Winnebago Navion 24V
2014 Tiffin Phaeton 36GH (sold)
2012 Tiffin Allegro 32CA (traded)
2012 Honda Fit