โDec-31-2016 11:12 AM
โJan-01-2017 08:54 AM
BFL13 wrote:55*29.6 plus about 15 percent for losses for bulk charging.
PT says the 100 will be doing 55 amps same as the 55 amper is. (But you don't add the amps)
If in fact the 100 is adding its voltage, but no amps, what would its draw on the generator be?
โJan-01-2017 08:44 AM
westend wrote:
Before you start any 24 V experimentation with your charging devices, I'd suggest you contact the mfg of these chargers and find out how they will react to having another power source in a series connection. Some devices don't have enough output isolation to try this and you could burn up a charger or all of them trying this out.
โJan-01-2017 08:43 AM
BFL13 wrote:I'd have to say (55 x 12) watts.
If in fact the 100 is adding its voltage, but no amps, what would its draw on the generator be?
โJan-01-2017 08:39 AM
2oldman wrote:BFL13 wrote:The 100 is adding 12v of pressure, but no volume. An increase in pressure (voltage) or volume (amps) raises the wattage.
I am having a hard time seeing how the 55 is doing 55 and the total output is 55, so why is the 100 doing anything?
โJan-01-2017 08:36 AM
โJan-01-2017 08:35 AM
BFL13 wrote:The 100 is adding 12v of pressure, but no volume. An increase in pressure (voltage) or volume (amps) raises the wattage.
I am having a hard time seeing how the 55 is doing 55 and the total output is 55, so why is the 100 doing anything?
โJan-01-2017 08:15 AM
2oldman wrote:BFL13 wrote:The 100 can't push 100a through the small 'pipe' of the 55. PT's analogy is a good one.
can you explain how come the 100 would do that a bit? .
For me it helps to think of a series of water pumps. Each increases the pressure, but volume is restricted by pipe diameter. Freeway traffic is another good analogy.
โJan-01-2017 08:09 AM
BFL13 wrote:The 100 can't push 100a through the small 'pipe' of the 55. PT's analogy is a good one.
can you explain how come the 100 would do that a bit? .
โJan-01-2017 07:03 AM
pianotuna wrote:
BFL13,
If you attach a 1/4" hose to a 6" pipe in series, the flow will be limited to what the 1/4" line can carry.
In your example, the 100 amp charger would only be doing 55 amps, while the 55 amp would be running flat out.
โJan-01-2017 06:39 AM
โDec-31-2016 08:43 PM
DrewE wrote:
you would get faster charging by rewiring the batteries in parallel and operating the two converters in parallel
โDec-31-2016 08:36 PM
โDec-31-2016 08:01 PM
If they were both 75 ampers at double the voltage then at the same full power, output would be 75 amps--37.5 amps each?
โDec-31-2016 06:49 PM
camperguy99 wrote:
I think we have overlooked a problem with the 55 amp unit. When the current gets near 55 amps it will go into current limit and "fold back the voltage" as the the current will decrease. For example look at the VI curves for the unpopular WFCO9855. I suspect others are similar. I have not been successful trying to parallel my 100 amp Magnum and a WFCO9855. No joy yet!
โDec-31-2016 06:27 PM
BFL13 wrote:
These are single constant voltage but adjustable voltage chargers, so I can make them both 14.8 (or anything else in their pot range (12-15.5v)
I am still amazed at the idea here. Right now I can get 155 amps on my 12v bank with the 55 and 100 ampers in parallel. But that maxes out the Honda 3000. If I can run the 75 and 100 on the 24v bank (same batts re-wired) with the Honda, that is 75 on the 24v bank, same as 150 on the 12v bank? Wow!
That is not slower/longer, so I am still suspicious. ๐
With a 24v bank I could run the 24v solar panel with a cheapo 12/24 PWM controller instead of the more expensive MPPT. (Tested that--gets equal or better results--see posts from two years ago or whenever that was)
Would still need a 24v inverter and a 24-12 converter (or put the rig's 12v converter on the 24v inverter.) The big 24v volt inverter is the killer for money, I think.