cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

Upper shock mount broke clear off. Flippin' unbelievable!

myredracer
Explorer II
Explorer II
Could have killed us:

We had Monroe shock absorbers installed on our TT care of our dealer when we got it new in April of 2014. The dealer insisted they take care of it so they sent it down the street to a suspension shop.

I handed over the shocks, lower mounting brackets, bolts and flat bar for the upper mounting brackets. All they had to do was the install and some welding. I made up a very detailed drawing showing EXACTLY how I wanted it installed. I showed the upper brackets to have 45 degree chamfers for max. weld penetration onto the beam surfaces. Seems like they totally ignored the drawing. With out going into a lot of details, they really botched the work and I went back TWICE again to try and get it taken care of but they refused in the end. The dealer (who we paid directly for the work) refused to have anything to do with it. So from the beginning I was NOT happy.

We just finished a 2500 mile trip through the Oregon Cascades from the Or/Wa border south into Ca. and on into Reno. Drove on a lot of highway sections with many twists and turns at speeds up to 60-65 mph. Numerous sheer drop-offs on one side too. Many downhill runs at up to 9% grade often with corners at the bottom to get around. A blowout on a tire could have been potentially deadly if it happened at 60+ mph, on a steep downhill descent, round a corner. Add a sheer drop-off and it gives me chills.

Got back on Friday and today I was looking underneath to check that all was okay. It's not. The upper mount from one of the shocks came clear off the I-beam it was welded to (or supposed to be welded to) - photo 1. The shock was obviously flopping around as the flared edge at the bottom of the upper half of the shock tube was rubbing against the tire and cut a sharp groove in the tire. Tire is now history. Photo 2 shows how the bracket is supposed to be positioned. I had specified that the 3" x 3/16" plate be welded to the top and bottom flanges of the beam. I can only surmise this happened closer to home.

I also wonder if the shock did not stay in the upright position and was flopping around what might have happened. Or if a blowout happened and the shock was flying around whacking things. Maybe might have been a lot of damage from flying rubber and other debris.

In looking closer at the broken bracket (last photo), there is NO weld material at all on the flange of the I-beam. They just did a butt joint with a surface weld instead of a chamfer that I asked for. Two of the other brackets have failed lower welds and I assume the 4th is no good with close inspection and maybe some dye.

I just don't don't know what to say at this point. Just glad we made it home okay. I even made mention of the shop in a post in another thread yesterday about how bad they were.

Will be interesting to see what the dealer says. It has nothing to do with the manufacturer, KZ (we have a 2 year warranty). We paid the dealer for the work and they insisted on the particular shop. We did not hire the suspension shop. It's one of those things that could even end up in court I suppose. I am totally pi**ed. I could even have done this myself with my MIG welder and done a good job or I know a mobile welder that could have done it too.

Maybe I'll just take up flying a small plane instead of RV-ing. Safer, cheaper and less aggravation.

54 REPLIES 54

LarryJM
Explorer II
Explorer II
Huntindog wrote:
myredracer wrote:
As well, the installation drawing I made up was sent to Lippert for approval and nothing was asked to be changed.
.

Now that is funny.
All the drawings that I have sent in didn't get a response indicating that changes were needed either.:B

Lippert or any other big company doesn't respond to every wanna be engineer that sends in proposed mod plans to their products.. Too much liability for them.

Lippert ignored you didn't they? If you even did that.
They are probably still laughing at the office.


I agree ... believing that a manufacturer would respond to such a thing shows a high degree of lack of understanding how things work. While I'm far from what I would call knowledgeable in subjects such as this it seems at least to me clearly demonstrate why one has to be careful in mucking around with some things. Of course I'm also one to strongly question the need for shocks on a non passenger carrying vehicle such as a trailer. I would guess for those few trailers offering such an option it is mainly there for marketing purposes and not for any real "ENGINEERING BASED NEED".

Larry
2001 standard box 7.3L E-350 PSD Van with 4.10 rear and 2007 Holiday Rambler Aluma-Lite 8306S Been RV'ing since 1974.
RAINKAP INSTALL////ETERNABOND INSTALL

Huntindog
Explorer
Explorer
myredracer wrote:
As well, the installation drawing I made up was sent to Lippert for approval and nothing was asked to be changed.
.

Now that is funny.
All the drawings that I have sent in didn't get a response indicating that changes were needed either.:B

Lippert or any other big company doesn't respond to every wanna be engineer that sends in proposed mod plans to their products.. Too much liability for them.

Lippert ignored you didn't they? If you even did that.
They are probably still laughing at the office.
Huntindog
100% boondocking
2021 Grand Design Momentum 398M
2 bathrooms, no waiting
104 gal grey, 104 black,158 fresh
FullBodyPaint, 3,8Kaxles, DiscBrakes
17.5LRH commercial tires
1860watts solar,800 AH Battleborn batterys
2020 Silverado HighCountry CC DA 4X4 DRW

Huntindog
Explorer
Explorer
In a bind does not mean contact... It would take contact to leave marks. Do the test I described with out the shocks in place. If you do NOT have the necessary clearance, then the shocks will be put in a bind. Nothing wrong with with the Northwood pic, except it doesn't really show how much clearance there is.... And as I noted before, welding to the top web of the frame is a great way to set the TT on fire. To do this the box needs to be lifted off of the frame... Think about what is intailed in doing this to an already built TT... It would make moving a gas line seem real easy... (it is, I've done it)
Huntindog
100% boondocking
2021 Grand Design Momentum 398M
2 bathrooms, no waiting
104 gal grey, 104 black,158 fresh
FullBodyPaint, 3,8Kaxles, DiscBrakes
17.5LRH commercial tires
1860watts solar,800 AH Battleborn batterys
2020 Silverado HighCountry CC DA 4X4 DRW

myredracer
Explorer II
Explorer II
If the shocks were binding, there'd be marks on the shock tubes, and there are none. If a person were to look closely at the geometry the wheels would have to move sideways at a substantial tilt for shocks to touch anything. I've looked at the wheels in a tight turn on hard pavement and the rims barely tilt but the tires are definitely distorted a lot. Shocks are mounted immediately above the bottom flange which is where the suspension would pivot left/right and the shock would remain approx. parallel to the rim. Just not possible for shocks to bind. No way, no how...

As well, the installation drawing I made up was sent to Lippert for approval and nothing was asked to be changed. The suspension shop however, changed the design on their own without asking anyone.

Look at how Northwood installs their shocks as in above photo. Exact same arrangement except that the top of the shock is mounted even higher than ours by 2-3 inches. If any shocks are going to bind in a turn, it would be shocks on Northwood trailers. But being as they are a highly respected manufacturer and their frames are off-road certified, I'm sure they have engineered it to work under the most strenuous of circumstances without binding. Also notice how they have a 3" wide (or so) piece of flat steel welded to the top and bottom flange of the I-beam. That is EXACTLY what I specified - partly as a web stiffener and partly as something to mount the shocks to, except someone changed that on me.

No harm done? Now have to replace a tire, have to pay someone to fix this properly plus have to go have words with the dealer.

The whole point of starting this thread was to show how bad a professional suspension shop's welding and work can be and what the consequences could have been, not to argue where shocks should be installed. Done, done, done...

Huntindog
Explorer
Explorer
DP
Huntindog
100% boondocking
2021 Grand Design Momentum 398M
2 bathrooms, no waiting
104 gal grey, 104 black,158 fresh
FullBodyPaint, 3,8Kaxles, DiscBrakes
17.5LRH commercial tires
1860watts solar,800 AH Battleborn batterys
2020 Silverado HighCountry CC DA 4X4 DRW

Huntindog
Explorer
Explorer
myredracer wrote:
I just found the printed instructions from Monroe and they say "if adequate clearance is available between the frame and tire, then outside frame installation may be completed" so for Monroe shocks, I've not contradicted what should be done.
Yes adequate clearance is needed.
How that measurement is taken makes all of the difference.

I believe that it should be measured when the axles are distorted as in a tight turn. IOW Take the TT with NO shocks installed, and jackknife it in reverse as tight as possible. Stop and measure. If there is enough room for the shock body between the frame and tire with about a 1/2' to spare, I'd say it's enough.

Your pics show about that much clearance with the axles in their resting position...

Do you as an engineer think my way is the correct way to measure the clearance? If not, why not?

I won't accept "I would never do that to my TT" as an answer. You never know just what situation may arise, requiring such a manuever. The time to find out if it is a problem is not on a trip.

I am a pretty good welder. Laid a few miles of bead over the years. I am confident that I could weld your brackets so that the welds would not break... But then the next weak link would. Could be the shock, or the base metal of the frame etc. The point is that whether these welds are good or not is really not relavent.. In fact having them tear away probably did you a favor in a warped sort of way. No real harm was done, and you now have an opportunity to make some improvements.

As for the shock orientation, NO I was not refering to shocks that are installed for and aft of a drive axle to control wrap.
My design would have both shocks on the same side (front or rear) the shocks would be angled from the tie plate towards the center of the trailer.

I am still of the belief that the reason your not so heavy duty axles and springs don't flex as much as others in tight turns is that the shocks are binding. When things bind, usually something eventually breaks.... If you do my test without the shocks... You will see the problem.
Huntindog
100% boondocking
2021 Grand Design Momentum 398M
2 bathrooms, no waiting
104 gal grey, 104 black,158 fresh
FullBodyPaint, 3,8Kaxles, DiscBrakes
17.5LRH commercial tires
1860watts solar,800 AH Battleborn batterys
2020 Silverado HighCountry CC DA 4X4 DRW

brulaz
Explorer
Explorer
I think all Northwood frames have the shocks mounted outside of the frame. Certainly Outdoors RV's Northwood frames do. And I've heard of no problems with this type of installation, but they are designed that way with perhaps wider axles than an after-market install might have.

Here's a screen shot of the shock installation.

2014 ORV Timber Ridge 240RKS,8500#,1250# tongue,44K miles
690W Rooftop + 340W Portable Solar,4 GC2s,215Ah@24V
2016 Ram 2500 4x4 RgCab CTD,2507# payload,10.8 mpgUS tow

myredracer
Explorer II
Explorer II
FlatBroke wrote:
First fifth wheel had no shocks. Second one had shocks, were at such angle that they possibly could not work, they eventually bent. Present trailer has shocks. Couldnt tell the difference in any of e'm.


I would expect that you'd notice less of a difference in a FW. because the pin doesn't move up and down like the tongue of a TT can. May depend on where you tow and how you tow. I know that the rear of our TT used to bob up and down like crazy and now it's rides very level in comparison. The handling is way better on twisty and bumpy roads and less vertical motion is transferred onto the hitch ball making for a smoother ride in the truck. A few factors will affect the improvement shocks make - trailer GW, spring rating, overall length, TV rating, etc.

myredracer
Explorer II
Explorer II
I just found the printed instructions from Monroe and they say "if adequate clearance is available between the frame and tire, then outside frame installation may be completed" so for Monroe shocks, I've not contradicted what should be done.

FlatBroke
Explorer II
Explorer II
First fifth wheel had no shocks. Second one had shocks, were at such angle that they possibly could not work, they eventually bent. Present trailer has shocks. Couldnt tell the difference in any of e'm.

Hitch Hiker
"08" 29.5 FKTG LS

myredracer
Explorer II
Explorer II
CJW8 wrote:
What huntindog said or... Get this kit from MORyde. It is a cross member kit. Mount the shocks between the crossmembers and the axles... on the inside of the springs. It looks like these crossmembers go between the spring hangers so there would no removal or cutting of the underbelly needed. All concerns addressed!


I know about the Mor/ryde crossmember, It's not for mounting of shocks. It's to reduce lateral movement of spring hangers during turns. Some have made those up themselves and is not a difficult job is you can weld. I know someone who did that and is not happy with unexpected effects of using it.

myredracer
Explorer II
Explorer II
Huntindog wrote:

He is right and here is why.

With the shocks mounted way they are, it is impossible for the axles to twist in a tight turn as they should. You may as well have a solid piece of pipe bolted in there. You state that your axles don't twist like others because your springs and frame are so heavy duty. That is an incorrect assumption. The shock simply are not allowing it to happen. Those forces how ever are still there. looking for a weak link to act on. They found it when the welds broke. Stronger welds are not the solution. That will just cause something else to break.

With the wheels off, there is good access to where the brackets are so the welder should have been able to work in there just fine.

Shocks are made to dampen unwanted spring oscillation while allowing all normal desireable axle movement to occur.

I also have a sealed underbelly, and I have been thinking how I would install shocks inboard of the frame without cutting it.

I would get a 1/4" thick piece of angle iron, long enough to span the width of the frame rails. 1.5x1.5 should work fine. It needs to be bolted or welded to the bottom of the frame web. One end of the shock will be bolted to it. The other end will be bolted to the inboard side of the spring tie plate, using a premade bracket or fabing one up.
The key here is that the shock eyes should not be in line like they are now. The shock needs to be twisted so that the shock eyes are 90 degrees to one another. The shock also will not be straight up and down like it is now, but at an angle. (this orientation is common on autos) With it mounted this way, the shock will allow all normal desireable axle movement to occur without binding, while still doing its job dampening spring oscillation.

Look at your springs. Notice that one of the ends is bolted directly to the hanger. The other end to a shackle/equalizer.
This means that as the spring is compressed, the axle tube moves towards the equalizer. Take this into account when positioning the angle iron, IE the tube should move away from the angle iron as the spring compresses allowing more clearance between the tube and the angle.

The beauty of this design is that if the angle is bolted instead of welded that it can be removed if needed to service what ever it is blocking.


Below are two photos of the welding on the top of the upper bracket and a repost of welding on the bottom. (White mark in 1st pic is just sunlight.) The top part of the bracket was essentially unattached to the frame. The bottom of the bracket has barely any weld material attaching it to the frame. It's difficult to get good clear closeup shots but these should show enough of what the welding job is like. You can't really see in the photos, but the welds are porous too which is not good - contaminated from improper cleaning of metal or equipment issues. Welds are brittle as a result and destined to fail.

There simply is NO other reason that the bracket failed other than the extremely bad welding job. If it becomes an argument with our dealer, I will have a certified welder give an opinion. It's a wonder this bracket held up as long as it did. The other brackets have to be close to the same. If the brackets had been installed on the inboard of the frame, the bad welding would have held up okay?

Maybe you were talking about axle wrap? Which happens when you brake, and the harder you brake the more the axle wants to rotate along it's axis. I was thinking left/right motion of the wheels. There is also the movement of the ends of the springs (next to the Dexter equalizers) in a fore/aft direction. I don't see how inboard or outboard shock mounting is affected by either. The reason shocks are supposed to be mounted at an angle is to dampen the axle wrap and movement due to equalizers.

The Monroe shocks have a eyelet which bolts at 90 degrees to the axis of the shock plus it has a rubber grommet. The shock isn't type with a bolt pointing in the same axis as the shocks. I have not been able to find anything from Mor/Ryde, Mobile Outfitters, Joy Rider, Monroe or Dexter that states you should not or recommend against mounting on the outside of a frame. If you have a link from one of these companies showing where they should be installed, I'd be interested in seeing it. I think one reason they end up on the inside in most cases is that there is not enough room between tires and the frame.

In our case, mounting the shocks in the inside of the frame is not possible without major work to relocate the iron pipe LP gas line which is immediately next to the lower flange of the beam. Can't even see how this would be done - maybe pulling down the underbelly and relocating the pipe above it.

Will probably end up getting a top local frame & axle shop to look at and fix this. They're gov't certified and have a certified welder on staff. I wanted to go there in the first place but the dealer insisted on sending it next door.

CJW8
Explorer
Explorer
What huntindog said or... Get this kit from MORyde. It is a cross member kit. Mount the shocks between the crossmembers and the axles... on the inside of the springs. It looks like these crossmembers go between the spring hangers so there would no removal or cutting of the underbelly needed. All concerns addressed!
2003 Forest River Sierra M-37SP Toy Hauler- Traded in
2015 Keystone Raptor 332TS 5th wheel toy Hauler (sold)
2004 Winnebago Vectra. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee toad

Huntindog
Explorer
Explorer
myredracer wrote:
copeland343 wrote:
Your shocks are to be mounted inside the frame not outside, that is why the weld broke and tire cut.


I'm going to respectfully have to disagree. Maybe you need to come here and look at it close up in person...


He is right and here is why.

With the shocks mounted the way they are, it is impossible for the axles to twist in a tight turn as they should. You may as well have a solid piece of pipe bolted in there. You state that your axles don't twist like others because your springs and frame are so heavy duty. That is an incorrect assumption. The shocks simply are not allowing it to happen. Those forces how ever are still there. looking for a weak link to act on. They found it when the welds broke. Stronger welds are not the solution. That will just cause something else to break.

Shocks are made to dampen unwanted spring oscillation while allowing all normal desireable axle movement to occur.

I also have a sealed underbelly, and I have been thinking how I would install shocks inboard of the frame without cutting it.

I would get a 1/4" thick piece of angle iron, long enough to span the width of the frame rails. 1.5x1.5 should work fine. It needs to be bolted or welded to the bottom of the frame web. One end of the shock will be bolted to it. The other end will be bolted to the inboard side of the spring tie plate, using a premade bracket or fabing one up.
The key here is that the shock will not be straight up and down like it is now, but at an angle. (this orientation is common on autos) With it mounted this way, the shock will allow all normal desireable axle movement to occur without binding, while still doing its job dampening spring oscillation.

Look at your springs. Notice that one of the ends is bolted directly to the hanger. The other end to a shackle/equalizer.
This means that as the spring is compressed, the axle tube moves towards the equalizer. Take this into account when positioning the angle iron, IE the tube should move away from the angle iron as the spring compresses allowing more clearance between the tube and the angle.

The beauty of this design is that if the angle is bolted instead of welded that it can be removed if needed to service what ever it is blocking.
Huntindog
100% boondocking
2021 Grand Design Momentum 398M
2 bathrooms, no waiting
104 gal grey, 104 black,158 fresh
FullBodyPaint, 3,8Kaxles, DiscBrakes
17.5LRH commercial tires
1860watts solar,800 AH Battleborn batterys
2020 Silverado HighCountry CC DA 4X4 DRW

myredracer
Explorer II
Explorer II
Huntindog wrote:

I seriously doubt that the frame is responsible for it. Most of it is due to the LOOSE tolerances in the springs and shackles. That is as it is designed. And yes I have had axles out and installed quite a few sets.

But it is apparent that you have made up your mind on what the issue is... I hope you are satisfied with whatever the result turns out to be.

Over and out.


I lashed a camcorder under the TT in the above photo. It was very surprising to watch the spring hangers flop left and right like a pendulum every time I turned a sharp corner. That was over 2 years ago. I if I can find it, I'll post it one day. There's things about the welded 3-piece frame that I just cannot get into detail on for reasons I cannot get into... I know there are some that have ended up with cracks in the vertical web of these beams just above the spring hangers due to the amount of left/right flexing in the frame and hangers that goes on.