cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

2020 Ford 7.3L Ike Gauntlet

ShinerBock
Explorer
Explorer
It did way better than I expected going up.

LINK
2014 Ram 2500 6.7L CTD
2016 BMW 2.0L diesel (work and back car)
2023 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 3.0L Ecodiesel

Highland Ridge Silverstar 378RBS
122 REPLIES 122

noteven
Explorer III
Explorer III
LanceRKeys wrote:
Not really because a hot rod 7.3 making 600hp would be much cooler!


You have to watch out for white Teslas though...

Tesla vs fast street cars

Bionic_Man
Explorer
Explorer
noteven wrote:
7.3 EcoBoost 600hp!

800 torques at 1800rpm!
No clouds of black smoke!
Runs on corn likker, avgas, red gas, regular, premium, or a blend!


And 5 MPG......
2012 RAM 3500 Laramie Longhorn DRW CC 4x4 Max Tow, Cummins HO, 60 gallon RDS aux fuel tank, Reese 18k Elite hitch
2003 Dodge Ram 3500 QC SB 4x4 Cummins HO NV5600 with Smarty JR, Jacobs EB (sold)
2002 Gulf Stream Sea Hawk 29FRB with Honda EV6010

LanceRKeys
Explorer
Explorer
Not really because a hot rod 7.3 making 600hp would be much cooler!

4x4ord
Explorer III
Explorer III
By the time a person covers the cost of modifying the 7.3 to get 600 HP would he not be further ahead buying a diesel and throwing a tuner on it?
2023 F350 SRW Platinum short box 4x4.
B&W Companion
2008 Citation Platinum XL 34.5

ShinerBock
Explorer
Explorer
I will say that doing mods like these will increase emissions output of these engines by a considerable amount similar to deleting a diesel especially with the tuning . The only difference is that he is likely emitting more CO, CO2, and more NOx than stock that cannot be seen while diesels emits more NOx and PM that can be seen.

Not saying this is wrong or bad, just putting it out there because people tend to chastise diesel owners for doing the same thing yet give gasoline hotroders a pass all because diesel emission can be seen and gas emissions can't yet they cause more harm to the environment. The second people mention deleting a diesel, someone talks about emissions yet not one person says a word when it is a gas engine even though it is emitting more greenhouse gases than the diesel. Not trying to start a diesel and gas war here, just pointing out the fact that this is no different than deleting a diesel.
2014 Ram 2500 6.7L CTD
2016 BMW 2.0L diesel (work and back car)
2023 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 3.0L Ecodiesel

Highland Ridge Silverstar 378RBS

danrclem
Explorer
Explorer
ShinerBock wrote:
Grit dog wrote:
danrclem wrote:
It didn't take hotrodders very long to start working on this engine.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/enthusiasts/fords-73-liter-v-8-can-make-600-naturally-aspirated-horsepower-with-basic-mods/ar-BBZC4PB?ocid=spartandhp


It was rumored that the 7.3 would be mod friendly, but I didn't expect the better part of 200hp with mostly bolt on parts.
That's seriously cool!
Pushrod engines aren't dead! And they're not 4' wide like OHC motors.


Yeah, that is a short list of parts for an additional 200hp. Usually it takes forced induction or at least $10k in parts to get that kind of bump out of an N/A engine.


I agree. The hp. gain is over 39% and considering that it already has 430 hp. that's a lot.

parker_rowe
Explorer
Explorer
RobertRyan wrote:
Grit dog wrote:

It was rumored that the 7.3 would be mod friendly, but I didn't expect the better part of 200hp with mostly bolt on parts.
That's seriously cool!
Pushrod engines aren't dead! And they're not 4' wide like OHC motors.

Not a lot of horsepower gain for a large capacity and presumably heavy engine. This was not designed as a hotrodders engine.


6 bolt mains, steel crank, ~300cfm heads, roller cam and rockers, canted valves, dimensionally smaller than any old school big block, roughly 30lbs more than an aluminum headed 351W and almost 100ci larger in displacement...

That sounds like a hotrodders wet dream. I also read it has the mod motor bell housing pattern, so manual transmissions should be doable without one off parts.

I know this is off topic but so far it looks like this is going to be a good engine for Ford, both as a workhorse and for enthusiasts.
2015 Starcraft TravelStar 239TBS 6500 GVWR
1997 GMC Suburban K2500 7.4 Vortec/4.10
1977 Kawasaki KZ1000

noteven
Explorer III
Explorer III
7.3 EcoBoost 600hp!

800 torques at 1800rpm!
No clouds of black smoke!
Runs on corn likker, avgas, red gas, regular, premium, or a blend!

ShinerBock
Explorer
Explorer
Grit dog wrote:
danrclem wrote:
It didn't take hotrodders very long to start working on this engine.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/enthusiasts/fords-73-liter-v-8-can-make-600-naturally-aspirated-horsepower-with-basic-mods/ar-BBZC4PB?ocid=spartandhp


It was rumored that the 7.3 would be mod friendly, but I didn't expect the better part of 200hp with mostly bolt on parts.
That's seriously cool!
Pushrod engines aren't dead! And they're not 4' wide like OHC motors.


Yeah, that is a short list of parts for an additional 200hp. Usually it takes forced induction or at least $10k in parts to get that kind of bump out of an N/A engine.
2014 Ram 2500 6.7L CTD
2016 BMW 2.0L diesel (work and back car)
2023 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 3.0L Ecodiesel

Highland Ridge Silverstar 378RBS

RobertRyan
Explorer
Explorer
Grit dog wrote:
danrclem wrote:
It didn't take hotrodders very long to start working on this engine.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/enthusiasts/fords-73-liter-v-8-can-make-600-naturally-aspirated-horsepower-with-basic-mods/ar-BBZC4PB?ocid=spartandhp


It was rumored that the 7.3 would be mod friendly, but I didn't expect the better part of 200hp with mostly bolt on parts.
That's seriously cool!
Pushrod engines aren't dead! And they're not 4' wide like OHC motors.

Not a lot of horsepower gain for a large capacity and presumably heavy engine. This was not designed as a hotrodders engine.

kw_00
Explorer
Explorer
4x4ord wrote:
I've got a '56 F100 that could be a candidate for a 7.3. Is it available as a crate engine?


Really cool! I donโ€™t know if itโ€™s available just yet but sure it will be soon. For several years the LS engine has been a popular swap. Iโ€™ve seen this engine in almost everything including Ford F100 series trucks. So now the 7.3 will be just as desired Iโ€™m sure... I have a 69 C10.. pretty close to original, I thought at one time to do the LS swap. Havenโ€™t pulled the trigger since I like to keep this one old school. But if you do that Ford... u need to document on YouTube, I would def would want to see it. The 7.3 is really impressive!
A truck, a camper, a few toys, but most importantly a wonderful family.

4x4ord
Explorer III
Explorer III
I've got a '56 F100 that could be a candidate for a 7.3. Is it available as a crate engine?
2023 F350 SRW Platinum short box 4x4.
B&W Companion
2008 Citation Platinum XL 34.5

danrclem
Explorer
Explorer
I would think that the way this engine is built it could handle some serious horsepower. It should last a long time for it's intended purpose but there could be some teething problems. If there are some they shouldn't be too hard to work out.

parker_rowe
Explorer
Explorer
Grit dog wrote:
danrclem wrote:
It didn't take hotrodders very long to start working on this engine.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/enthusiasts/fords-73-liter-v-8-can-make-600-naturally-aspirated-horsepower-with-basic-mods/ar-BBZC4PB?ocid=spartandhp


It was rumored that the 7.3 would be mod friendly, but I didn't expect the better part of 200hp with mostly bolt on parts.
That's seriously cool!
Pushrod engines aren't dead! And they're not 4' wide like OHC motors.


I've seen dyno tunes of GM 6.0 2500's picking up around 50hp to the wheels....those HD truck tunes are REAL conservative.

Once you start looking for power with 93 octane or e85, instead of pulling 16K up a hill on 87 octane...you can pick up some power for sure.

As a car guy who I'm really excited for this engine to start showing up in the junkyards...a cam and a tune and you have a hot street engine similar in size to a 351W, but better in every way. Maybe we'll see less Fords with GM LSx swaps!
2015 Starcraft TravelStar 239TBS 6500 GVWR
1997 GMC Suburban K2500 7.4 Vortec/4.10
1977 Kawasaki KZ1000

noteven
Explorer III
Explorer III
I might have range anxiety at 2.4mpg while racing everyone to the top of the hill to win... um...you know...what the winner wins...when they win...