Forum Discussion
Dadoffourgirls
Nov 25, 2019Explorer
Grit dog wrote:
^Those are some good glass half full wishes or presumptions.
It may turn out to be a good engine, it's just not proven and it's not cheaper, not more economical, not as powerful, not proven and not widely accepted. So add all that up and it probably won't have as good of resale down the line either.
It's great someone is buying them, but currently the better option based on the above considerations is stick with the powerful, economical and proven 5.3.
Heck even GM doesn't rate it better fuel mileage except slightly better in city mpg.
Just not a well thought out option IMO, more of a marketing gimmick to steal a few customers from Ford.
Don't let your dislike for GM get in your way facts and changing them to wishes or presumptions.
Fact - City mpg is better
Fact - Engine is standard on LT and 5.3 cost $1395 more
As for GM business decisions, there are many variables to all decisions regarding vehicles. Are you an executive at another OEM to know all the important aspects of running an automotive manufacturing company?
About Travel Trailer Group
44,029 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 21, 2025