My Son wants to buy this TC, Is he Crazy?

Hey everyone, THANKS!!

Since I don't post much here as I am often far from any internet service. I am sure most no longer know me. But one thing I have learned, in the years I was lurking and a member, is the fact there is some sage advice here on this forum.

I have sent this link to my son, so he will be able to sift through the comments and come to a decision that is best for him. Many of the things that have been written here were things I already brought to his attention, in an earlier email. it is always good to here consistent suggestions.

All the best to everyone and thanks for some $$$ suggestions, Mark/GpnAZ, too. Who knows, he might be one of the newer TC members here soon.

b

Looks like a nice camper, depending on supply and demand in his area, he might be able to talk him down another $500-$750. I would tell him to be prepared on spending another $1000-$1500 dollars to beef up the suspension plus what it costs for tie downs. As long as the camper is as nice in person as it is in the pictures and everything works, it should make a nice first camper. It would be nice if the owner would let him try it on his truck first. Tell him good luck!

There's an S&S Brand logo on the rear by the ladder, you can see it when you expand the photo on craigslist.

Did the same as Jaycocreek. Kept the 1 ton SRW but sold the Lance and got a pop-up. I'm way under my GCVW now, even loaded up with 'stuff. and it makes a world of difference not just in handling but in fuel mileage and off road ability too.

Don't even know the camper is back there unless I look in the mirrors. Big seat of the pants difference between the Lance and the Palomino. Even adding the trailer with the quads don't make an impact. Weight is everything, especially weight above the bed rails.

If I get another one (doubtful at my age), I'll go even lighter with either an Alaskan or a FWC pop-up unit. My wife and I (and my hunting pals) don't need a dry bath or a fireplace or a big screen TV to be comfortable. All we need is a dry comfortable place to sleep and basic cooking necessities. My 'entertainment center' is my CCrane weather am/fm radio and I don't watch TV anyway so a TV is not a necessity.

Don't get me wrong, I like the big units but I have no need for one.

My concern (no matter what the weight actually is), is the ability of the rear end on the truck to carry it without bearing and ring and pinion issues. Don't know squat about Japanese rear ends other than they certainly aren't as stout as a Dana 60 or 80. Then you have the gearbox to worry about. Again, not familiar with Japanese slush boxes or standard boxes either but I'm sure the clutch isn't all that big to begin with.

Decades ago, I had a Mazda and a Datsun pickup and both had pretty lightweight drivelines. I have to say I beat both pretty hard and neither failed. Both succumbed to rust in the end.

On a Tacoma you've exceeded the rear axle rating by about 200lbs. You can put E-rated tires and stuff chunks of well casing between the axle and frame, but it will never be a particularly stable or satisfying drive.

I would never argue a 1/2 ton is a better camper hauler than a 3/4 ton or a 3/4 ton better than a 3500 dually..Just saying,it can be done and driven without issue.I have done it four times on different 1/2 tons with mods and never had any axle issues or anymore sway than the multiple campers I put on my 3/4 tons.

The op said his son understands over weight which I would assume means he understands the issues that "could" arise just like I am sure everyone that is close to 1000 lbs over GVWR understands also.

This time around,I went just the opposite of what I have done in the past..I bought a 3500 dually so I was not limited on camper selection on the used market..Ended up 500 lbs under GVWR loaded for the hills and full of gas and water with a 9.6 ft camper.

Good luck to the op and his son as light weight 1/2 ton compatible truck campers are in high demand in the northwest and get a premium price from what I have seen.

Crazy people have all the fun... tell him to go for it!

Capri's are light but very spartan inside and personally, I don'r care much for them. Don't like the layout. I see (NS) make a non over the cab sleeper option thats light as well but not much room inside, deleting the over cab bed. There is also a camper called a Razor thats a non-cab over as well but I know nothing about them and from what I've seen in pictures, they don't look to be at all comfortable and probably are not well made either.... but then what is well made today in the RV world....

Still think the 'sit it on and check the squat factor will be the telling test'.... if 1045 is a pie in the sky figure or not. The truck will tell you right away.

"By about the same" yes, but 500lbs of extra weight on a Toyota Tacoma has a much more adverse effect than 500lbs of extra weight on an F250.

On a Tacoma you've exceeded the rear axle rating by about 200lbs. You can put E-rated tires and stuff chunks of well casing between the axle and frame, but it will never be a particularly stable or satisfying drive.

On an F250 you've still got another 1000lbs to go to reach the rear axle rating.

I was looking for a light weight truck camper for my F-150 sometime ago.There are overhead truck campers in the 1,000 lb(dry weight) category..Capri is one that comes to mind at 1145 lbs (I think)..Ofcourse that is without options just like the tags on other pickup camper trucks.

So what would be the difference in this person with a payload of 1500 lbs buying a camper with a 1045 dry weight or a 3/4 ton with a payload of 3000 lbs buying an Arctic Fox 865 with a dry weight of 2641 lbs?

There both going to be over GVWR by about the same, just like the majority of truck camper owners.