Jbird1311 wrote:
Hey guys, how about this one? It has the unloaded vehicle weight at #5900. Is that too heavy for unloaded?
With options and propane, the "empty weight" of that TT probably would be closer to 6200#.
Let's assume you load fairly heavy (perhaps 1500#) resulting in a loaded TT weight of 7700#.
A tongue weight percentage of 13% would give a loaded TW of 1000#.
You've passed the first hurdle because your receiver is rated for a TW of 1050# when using a WDH.
Since you're paying good money for the WDH, you might as well take advantage of the fact that using a WDH will reduce the amount of vertical load the TT imposes on the TV.
A properly sized and properly adjusted WDH can transfer a load equal to 25% of TW to the TT's axles.
This means the vertical load imposed on the TV by the TT can be equal to about 75% of the TW.
So, using a WDH with a 1000# TW can cause the TT to add only 750# to the TV.
However, you also must add the weight of the WDH (about 100#), so the total load added to the TV would be 850#
Given the sticker "payload" value of 1637# and a TT/WDH imposed load of 850# means you have a remaining payload of 787# to cover the weight of occupants and miscellaneous cargo carried in the TV.
If you can limit the weight of family plus cargo to 787#, your TV should be able to handle a 7700# TT without exceeding GCWR, receiver TW rating, TV GVWR, or rear GAWR.
If you load the TT to, say, 7200#, the tongue weight (at 13%) would be 936#, and the TT/WDH would add a load of 936x0.75 + 100 = 800# to the TV.
Then, the weight of occupants plus cargo would have to be limited to 837#.
It's up to the OP to determine how much weight of occupants and cargo will be added to the TV.
And, it's up to him to decide whether he wants to use the TV to carry as much load as the TV manufacturer says it can.
Ron