Forum Discussion
Atlee
Mar 11, 2018Explorer II
I agree about everyone not wanting a "condo" on wheels. Of course, my trailer (27 ft from bumper to hitch) is huge compared to yours, it's still relative small to a lot of trailers out there.
I've also found that if you're under 30 feet your options at national parks are much greater. Just looking at Fishing Bridge in Yellowstone NP, for example, the 40' and under sites have been sold out for a long time. Most sites 35' and under have been gone for a long time. But there are still a fair number of sites still available for 30' and under.
I've also found that if you're under 30 feet your options at national parks are much greater. Just looking at Fishing Bridge in Yellowstone NP, for example, the 40' and under sites have been sold out for a long time. Most sites 35' and under have been gone for a long time. But there are still a fair number of sites still available for 30' and under.
jfkmk wrote:
All very nice campers with good floor plans.
Despite some opinions, not everyone is into huge campers and use smaller campers as stepping stone for huge campers. It's hard for some to imagine, but there are folks (myself included) who prefer smaller campers. We don't need a rolling condo to be happy.
I don't think many campers are designed for 2-3 years use, that sounds ridiculous. We've had our 17 footer for 5 years, and it's in as good a shape as when it was new. Does it have cheaply made cabinets as described? Yeah, so do most other sub $100k campers, and our previous class C.
Go for any of the campers you listed, and have a blast.
About Travel Trailer Group
44,030 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 21, 2025