ScottG wrote:
rhagfo wrote:
ScottG wrote:
Cummins12V98 wrote:
Truck stops truck, RV stops RV.
That's internet urban legend stuff.
I have read literature from both Ram and Ford that describe how when combined weight rating rises, so must the trucks service brakes because it's part of the overall braking performance of the entire load.
Scott, you do realize that GCWR is based on rear gear and HP/Torque not brake size.
Don't know about the 2004, but the rear brake shoes for a 2001 Ram 2500 is the same as the 3500 DRW.
I'm sorry but according to Dodge/Ram, that is not the only factor in how they calculate it. They do indeed factor in braking and also, cooling and frame build, which had to be updated before they could rate them at 30K.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying they have different brake shoes for every little weight change, the brakes clearly span a range of capacities.
Scott, are you referring to the big jump in 2013, or the differences between the three engine HP/Torque ratings.
If you are making more HP and Torque, yes there are for sure cooling differences. I am not sure how different the frames between the air ride and leaf spring rear axles. It is possible that seeing how they use leaf springs to locate the axle with the air system the differences are minimal.
I know for my 2001 Ram 2500, an exhaust brake should be used with a 5er over 10,000#.