happycamper002 wrote:
Fulltimedaniel wrote:
. . . Now "Needlessly" seems to be the operative term here. Are these higher costs necessary? I don't think so. And it is no insult to say it. Canada is a great country with a great people. But your collective skin can be a bit thin at times.
I have been complained to by many Canadians about Americas crime, our dirty streets, our guns (I dont own one) our politicians and unbelievably about our high costs??? None of it makes me angry. I take it in stride.
Maybe it is because I have spent so much of my life overseas living and working in other countries and hearing what everyone from Palestinians to Indonesians to Canadians think about my country both positive and negative that I take these discussions amiably.
I have been personally blamed by Australians traveling in Indonesia for the treatment of Palestinians by Israel...I pointed out to that person that when (then) President Reagan accepts my calls and my advice I will surely set him straight.
I made no claim in any of my posts which country was better in one way or another only that one was more expensive...even with the exchange rate in our favor. That is a fact as clearly pointed out by the Globe and Mail article. It is also a fact as evidenced by the tens of thousands of Canadians that continue to stream across the border to buy Gas and shop at WalMart and Target and other places in our towns along the border.
If the two countries were more equal in costs this money would go into the Canadian economy and there would be more taxes collected to help pay for your better services in health care and education.
But blaming an outsider for pointing out the obvious seems a bit churlish to me. I look forward to my next trip through Canada coming up here in a few days on my way to Alaska. . . .
End of abbreviated quote.
My response:
I love the articulation but I have to digress.
I have not had a chance to read the original post before it evaporized but (it looks like) that whatever it was it was not the gist of this debate.
When you branded that cost of living as “needlessly” high, you are implying that your observation about a country's economy should be based on what you've seen in the country you're in. . . in this case the US.
This is a rehash of what the Canadian had said which I thought I had to mention for the sake of relevance and decorum, because the original post is “gone with the wind”.
I don't know if you've run a business. I did run my own business for some time in the past.
In a country (Canada) whose economy is based on free enterprise (laissez-faire) which means a business can charge their services as the market is willing to pay.
Customers have the option of patronizing the said business but they are also free not to buy what the business has to offer.
I've lived in Australia where my sister resides permanently which allows me to stay as long as I want. The last time I was there was when the Aussie dollar went through roof. It rose above the USD by about six cents which means 1 USD was only worth 94 cents in Australia. My profession took me to the jungles of Laos, the offshore oil platforms in Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela to the pristine villages in Northern Thailand to mention a few.
Now the Aussie dollar is worth appprox USD 70 cents.
The rate of exchange wasn't that far off in Canada at that time --they seemed to go hand in hand.
It did cost my USD a lot to buy a whole roasted chicken in down town Melbourne-- 12.00 USD that will would only cost 5.75 USD at Sams Club. And how about a pound of banana that did cost me 7 USD.
Hasty generalization based on one instance is faulty reasoning. I've only camped in Canada once sometime back.
Have you camped in other RV Parks on several occasions all in one setting? I'm sure all of them do not charge “needlessly” high. Fierce competition is what makes free enterprise excels that satisfies both seller and buyer.
I don't expect that you or other posters to agree on this. . . but the least we can do is “agree to disagree”.
Happy camping.
I have been traveling in Canada since the mid seventies not including my first trip to Alaska in 1972.
I grew up in a Family Business and have owned my own large and small businesses and headed corporations.
I based my term "Needlessly" on economic factors not political ones. It has nothing to do with costs in this country. And nothing is implied by that observation. I do agree that it may be perceived that way however.
If you read the Globe and Mail article posted with the comments you extracted and posted here you would have seen they agreed with my assessment.
But lets look at this another way: America is a very cheap industrialized country to live in Compared to most other industrialized countries. There are many factors that go into that not least of which is our huge population with great buying power and a progressive tax system.
When my good friends from England came here to go to the Grand Canyon and other parks with us last year they said "Good god gas is TOO CHEAP here!" I said 'Oh Please DONT say that!" They were amazed at how cheap our food is and Wal Mart was a true pricing wakeup call for them. I was not insulted by this.
Petrol in Great Britain is about $6.00 per gallon. How can the same crude oil cost 3 times as much in GB than in the US? Well a smaller market, and higher distribution costs and higher wages. But does that add up to 3 times? No not by any economic terms. So does petrol "NEED" to cost that much. No. So what is the difference. In GB it's partially high taxes but it's also a theory of economics that holds that people will pay what they are USED to paying regardless of other economic factors such as supply and demand. This basically means that Gas is Needlessly high in GB.
There is a wonderful Jam made in Switzerland where I first had it. HERO Jam costs more in Switzerland (one and a half times) where it's made than it does in the US. It costs LESS than that in Cambodia. Is that truly necessary? NO. The company knows it can get a certain pricing level in the US a different one in Switzerland and yet a third and lower one in Cambodia. It is the same jam. And even though it traveled to Cambodia via Australia it still costs less and there is still profit in it for everyone.
I think this is what happens in Canada to some extent. Not with RV parks by the way which are for the most part on a par with what one would expect, but with certain products and services.
My bet is that the same folks who have taken me to task over this statement do more than their share of complaining about certain costs in their home country and are being a bit disingenuous. And this is NOT about politics it is about economics and the cost of traveling through another country.
But this is terribly off topic for this thread and should not really have come up here. It did because a certain member seems to have a personal problem with me.(not the author of the quoted post above) I apologize to the posters on this thread that he saw fit to hijack it and I take my share of responsibility for answering.
Perhaps now we can get back to the original topic?