A very different take on a Class C
Notice it is a Cabover Japanese MDT not available in the US, neither is the toad Pickup Truck. Body is different. Pickup Truck has a 4.5litre V8 Diesel.
Forum Discussion
Notice it is a Cabover Japanese MDT not available in the US, neither is the toad Pickup Truck. Body is different. Pickup Truck has a 4.5litre V8 Diesel.
RobertRyan wrote:
Notice it is a Cabover Japanese MDT not available in the US, neither is the toad Pickup Truck. Body is different. Pickup Truck has a 4.5litre V8 Diesel.
Whoever said you can't take it with you...never saw this rig. ;)- Here is the Toad towing
The Wild West Coast of Tasmania
Northen Queensland
timmac wrote:
Wow I guess I am not the only one out there will custom a built stacker for our toys.
American version
Australian version
Very common here, stackers
pnichols wrote:
According to some of Robert's photos in various threads plenty of customers in Australia are nowadays going for "form" over "function", too.
Australia still has a huge land mass as compared to it's relatively low population ... like the U.S. used to have many decades ago. I prefer the ratio that Australia still has and if I RV'd there I'd take advantage of it by using a near expedition-grade RV to explore all over the place in the interior as much as legally possible. Of course one has to be a remote desert lover to appreciate that kind of RV'ing.
The documentary "From Alice to Ocean" clearly showed (to me) the beauty and allure of the pristine Australian Outback ... what an RV'ing dream place. There are only a few places left in the U.S. where this experience can be somewhat duplicated in an RV. We've been to one place and camped there in our Class C that maybe came close ... a spot in the Oregon Outback.
Australia has Alpine, considerable subTropical/tropical climate and the biggest Mediterranean Climate in the World in Western Australia.j-d wrote:
I've long thought that the smaller diesel cabover MDT's would make a great chassis for a Class C with some capacity, decent fuel mileage, reliability, and ease of driving.
I've thought though, that it'd be more of a Truck Camper, since my understanding was a "motor-home" had to have the cockpit accessible from the living quarters.
Is that what everybody still thinks? I remember cars called "Hardtop Convertible" where the top didn't fold, come off, or whatever. But no Center Post, no Window Frames. Then GM re-defined it. OK to have a center post and windows, just frame-less door windows.
Anyhow, I would give up a cut-away cab-chassis to keep a more solid small motor-home.
And, Robert, I like the vehicles and RV's you have Down There. The pickup you just pictured bears that out. Function over Form. Here in USA, it's all about Form...
It is not a small diesel. 8.8 litre or a 9.8litre. Par for the course for Japanese MDT's here- Wow I guess I am not the only one out there will custom a built stacker for our toys.
American version
Australian version - According to some of Robert's photos in various threads plenty of customers in Australia are nowadays going for "form" over "function", too.
Australia still has a huge land mass as compared to it's relatively low population ... like the U.S. used to have many decades ago. I prefer the ratio that Australia still has and if I RV'd there I'd take advantage of it by using a near expedition-grade RV to explore all over the place in the interior as much as legally possible. Of course one has to be a remote desert lover to appreciate that kind of RV'ing.
The documentary "From Alice to Ocean" clearly showed (to me) the beauty and allure of the pristine Australian Outback ... what an RV'ing dream place. There are only a few places left in the U.S. where this experience can be somewhat duplicated in an RV. We've been to one place and camped there in our Class C that maybe came close ... a spot in the Oregon Outback. RobertRyan wrote:
Nice, it looks like an off road beast. Thanks.- I've long thought that the smaller diesel cabover MDT's would make a great chassis for a Class C with some capacity, decent fuel mileage, reliability, and ease of driving.
I've thought though, that it'd be more of a Truck Camper, since my understanding was a "motor-home" had to have the cockpit accessible from the living quarters.
Is that what everybody still thinks? I remember cars called "Hardtop Convertible" where the top didn't fold, come off, or whatever. But no Center Post, no Window Frames. Then GM re-defined it. OK to have a center post and windows, just frame-less door windows.
Anyhow, I would give up a cut-away cab-chassis to keep a more solid small motor-home.
And, Robert, I like the vehicles and RV's you have Down There. The pickup you just pictured bears that out. Function over Form. Here in USA, it's all about Form... gbopp wrote:
From the way the boat sits on the trailer, it looks like it may be a custom build?
The toad looks pretty cool, I wish it was a better picture.
Thanks for posting.
