Forum Discussion

MrWizard's avatar
MrWizard
Moderator
Nov 06, 2018

Brake Pads.. Ceramic verus Semi-metallic

getting ready to do the front brakes on my 1997 F53 Bounder

I'm thinking ceramic is better for heat dissipation on a heavy MH
right or wrong ? pros/cons ?
  • My Lincoln MKZ has ceramic pads, and they wear very well, but they squeak a lot. Don't know if it would be the same with your rig.
  • I replaced the OEM semi-metallic pads on my 2500 RAM CTD with ceramic Akebono pads. They made a world of difference when stopping, especially when towing. An added plus is no brake dust on my wheels.
  • I don't think the heat affects the pads much. It's the heat boiling the brake fluid that's a problem on our F53s.
    My 95 F53 don't stop well when the brakes are at ambient temperature, they need to warm up a little for best braking.
    You may want to consider DOT 5.1 brake fluid. I believe it has a higher boiling point than DOT 4.

    Also, check the outer brake pad fit in the caliper mounting bracket before you secure it to the caliper. I find most pads are a touch too long and don't float well in the bracket. It needs to float to release properly.

    Richard
  • Ceramic can handle higher heats but carbon metallic provides better braking but are dirtier. Ask any race car driver. Most use carbon metallic.