Ford cruise control

Would rather not have to PAY the extra cost for the adaptive CC. That's up there with reverse sensors that I don't need or want. Coach costs enough as it is let alone adding in extras to replace what has worked out pretty well so far. Plus adaptice CC won't change the transmission shift programming anyways and I wouldn't expect Ford to change it either just for the F53 platform without adding in more costs for the one off configuration that will be passed along to the end user.

What is really needed is driverless motorhomes, then no user input would be required.

shum02 wrote:

Tvov wrote:

shum02 wrote:
....

Unfortunately not available on Super Duty's yet

Yes, that is pretty much what we are talking about...

Not everyone. Most seem to be blanketing the statement across the entire product line. Adjusting a CC to work while towing or being loaded to GVWR takes a bit of work and then throw a hill/mountain at the equation. Not totally sure but I have a feeling the engineers at Ford are probably aware of the problem and have been working on it. To bad they don't understand that people want results today, now............

Mine works great unloaded or towing on the flats but I totally agree it is VERY aggressive when under load. Usually kick it off myself because my right foot does a better job of fuel economy in the hills than the computer can anyway.

Well it`s been 12 years for me, and longer for others. how long can it take to rewrite software that works correctly?

Tvov wrote:

shum02 wrote:
....

Unfortunately not available on Super Duty's yet

Yes, that is pretty much what we are talking about...

Not everyone. Most seem to be blanketing the statement across the entire product line. Adjusting a CC to work while towing or being loaded to GVWR takes a bit of work and then throw a hill/mountain at the equation. Not totally sure but I have a feeling the engineers at Ford are probably aware of the problem and have been working on it. To bad they don't understand that people want results today, now............

Mine works great unloaded or towing on the flats but I totally agree it is VERY aggressive when under load. Usually kick it off myself because my right foot does a better job of fuel economy in the hills than the computer can anyway.

shum02 wrote:
....

Unfortunately not available on Super Duty's yet

Yes, that is pretty much what we are talking about...

Semi Retired Grandpa wrote:

timmac wrote:

427435 wrote:
I really don't understand all the bitc+++g. If you are unhappy with the noise levels, add some insulation to the dog house. If you are unhappy because it kicks down too easy, learn to shut it off on hills and just use the gas pedal at a moderate setting a so it kicks down at a slower speed.

I've learned to put my foot on the throttle to over ride the CC when going down hill to pick up some speed. I will also kick it out of O/D a little early when climbing a hill to ease the shift and maintain the desired speed.

In any event, the CC on my old F53, pulling a 5000 lb toad, works as good as I can expect.

Its not that we are bitc+++g just pointing out that CC have not gotten better over the years as the rest of the chassis, same as with our Nissin truck, every time it gets to a hill the CC shuts off, they can develop a smart CC that knows its in the hills and slows down the speed and just down shift 1 gear and not 2 gears, when I am on a long hill and maintaining 45 mph I can do it in 4th gear but if I put the CC on it wants to go to 3rd gear.

I think todays CC is the same as 30 years ago, nothing has changed in this department.

So true with the Ford - our SUV (car also) shifts down one gear at a time - the change barely discernible. We can travel up and down Oregon's mountains w/o having to adjust the CC. BTW - the car also senses the speed of the vehicle in front and adjusts speed accordingly. Very relaxing - a far cry from the Ford where even the slightest grade too often results in a dramatic change in engine RPM's. Far past time for Ford to bring its CC up to today's level.

You REALLY should pay attention to what is NEW and not what WAS. Ford's new vehicles do have "adaptive cruise control". Spend a little of your free time researching first.

Ford adaptive cruise control

Unfortunately not available on Super Duty's yet

timmac wrote:

427435 wrote:
I really don't understand all the bitc+++g. If you are unhappy with the noise levels, add some insulation to the dog house. If you are unhappy because it kicks down too easy, learn to shut it off on hills and just use the gas pedal at a moderate setting a so it kicks down at a slower speed.

I've learned to put my foot on the throttle to over ride the CC when going down hill to pick up some speed. I will also kick it out of O/D a little early when climbing a hill to ease the shift and maintain the desired speed.

In any event, the CC on my old F53, pulling a 5000 lb toad, works as good as I can expect.

Its not that we are bitc+++g just pointing out that CC have not gotten better over the years as the rest of the chassis, same as with our Nissin truck, every time it gets to a hill the CC shuts off, they can develop a smart CC that knows its in the hills and slows down the speed and just down shift 1 gear and not 2 gears, when I am on a long hill and maintaining 45 mph I can do it in 4th gear but if I put the CC on it wants to go to 3rd gear.

I think todays CC is the same as 30 years ago, nothing has changed in this department.

So true with the Ford - our SUV (car also) shifts down one gear at a time - the change barely discernible. We can travel up and down Oregon's mountains w/o having to adjust the CC. BTW - the car also senses the speed of the vehicle in front and adjusts speed accordingly. Very relaxing - a far cry from the Ford where even the slightest grade too often results in a dramatic change in engine RPM's. Far past time for Ford to bring its CC up to today's level.

427435 wrote:
I really don't understand all the bitc+++g. If you are unhappy with the noise levels, add some insulation to the dog house. If you are unhappy because it kicks down too easy, learn to shut it off on hills and just use the gas pedal at a moderate setting a so it kicks down at a slower speed.

I've learned to put my foot on the throttle to over ride the CC when going down hill to pick up some speed. I will also kick it out of O/D a little early when climbing a hill to ease the shift and maintain the desired speed.

In any event, the CC on my old F53, pulling a 5000 lb toad, works as good as I can expect.

Its not that we are bitc+++g just pointing out that CC have not gotten better over the years as the rest of the chassis, same as with our Nissin truck, every time it gets to a hill the CC shuts off, they can develop a smart CC that knows its in the hills and slows down the speed and just down shift 1 gear and not 2 gears, when I am on a long hill and maintaining 45 mph I can do it in 4th gear but if I put the CC on it wants to go to 3rd gear.

I think todays CC is the same as 30 years ago, nothing has changed in this department.

Another solution is to get a scan gauge. A couple of possible readings with it are % load and % throttle. You can quickly learn at which points the CC shifts down. Just before the shift occurs, turn the CC off and hold the % throttle with your foot.

I don't find the shift from 4th (OD) to 3rd that objectionable, but I've insulated the dog house with good sound damping material.

Semi Retired Grandpa wrote:
Ford can and should do better - other manufacturers certainly do.

They did on the new systems.

Ford/IH built the gasser V10 and 6.0L PSD to rev and they do. They are NOT low RPM motors like the I6 Cummins. When it needs to accelerate or maintain speed on an incline with a load behind it it will downshift sometime maybe 2 gears to maintain that speed. Keeping it under 55mph/90kph with the T/H button on will normally keep her out of OD lessening the downshifting of the tranny but this does use more fuel. A set of 4:88's like in the F450 will also lessen the downshifting :)