I think from what I'm reading that my thought process is flawed. That would come as no surprise to many but I like to think I follow along reasonable well.
My reading, I thought, had told me "if you buy a high end older coach like Newell or Prevost you will have more success than a top of the line production coach"!
Am I correct with the following statement thinking of "cost of ownership"?
A 5 year old American Eagle/Heritage and a Newmar Essex/Mountain Aire will provide a better cost of ownership than a 12 year old Newell/Prevost? They are reasonably close in price used!
HJ