desobelman wrote:
RedQuad,
While I agree that the ReadyBrake Elite System is pretty bullet proof, it is a surge braking system, not fully proportional.
The InvisiBrake System, also by Roadmaster, is fully proportional and once installed there is nothing to do but hook up the car to the tow bar and go! I had it added to my new towed vehicle and love it! I use the Blue Ox tow bar because I already owned it from previous RV/Towed. I like the Blue Ox because of the "hidden" connector system. When the tow bar is unhooked from the car, you hardly notice any connections on the front of the car.
I also prefer the proportional braking system as it applies the brakes in the same proportion as the MH brakes instead of only when enough surge is transferred to the braking system. I do not mean to infer that the ReadyBrake is inferior, the InvisiBrake is just my preference.
Happy Trails! :W
Darryl
Incredible amount of misinformation all over this thread. First of all read the FAQ second item down on Roadmatser's site, it clearly states Invisibrake is NOT proportional.
Second item, virtually all proportional breaking systems except for a system that connects to the motorhome air brakes, ARE SURGE BRAKES. Electronic proportional braking systems have a inertia sensor that senses deceleration - ie surge, and applies the brakes, based on the motorhome rate of deceleration. Regardless of how the sensor works, these systems are fully dependent on the ability of the motorhome to be able to stop.
Lastly, ReadyBrake
is fully proportional. It will provide variable braking, based on how hard the motorhome is stopping. Not only that, but it is the only closed loop systems that is self monitoring, in that it only provides enough braking to make the car neutral in its deceleration. When I set up the damper spring on my ReadyBrake, I towed my 4600 LBS Grand Cherokee with my 3100 lbs XJ. I adjusted the damper so that I had perfectly neutral response from light braking to very hard braking. Under stopping, the toad made no measurable difference in my ability to get stopped. 2 conclusions that can be drawn from this. First of all, the fact that the toad vacuum assist is not active is a NON-ISSUE. If vacuum was necessary, a 3100 lbs car would not be stopping a 4600 lbs car. Plenty of available stopping power. Secondly, the fact the the car had a neutral effect on my stopping ability, means the proportional effect of the system is extremely accurate.
Something else to think about: A car is very capable of out stopping any motorhome. This means that a compression sensing braking system is very capable of providing every bit of stopping power necessary to result in ZERO impact on the motorhome stopping distance. Compression surge systems get a bit of a bad rap on trailers, mainly because the tow vehicle is often lighter than the trailer. On snow and ice, it is possible for the tow vehicle to not provide enough stopping to overcome the damping spring. This will never happen in a motorhome, because the motorhome's shear weight compared to the toad will always be enough to overcome the damping spring.(for clarification, the damping spring is adjusted relative to the trailer weight. Heavy trailers will need a stronger damping spring, and therefor will hinder the compression aspect on snow and ice. Motorhome weight relative to toad weight means the spring will be plenty soft enough to work properly on snow and ice).
And a last observation. I was in a panic stop once. The motorhome brakes locked up, but I also heard the toad brakes screech as well. The screech was short lived, as the system equalized to the appropriate amount of braking. It should also be noted that the system equalized smoothly.