Wrong Pump in AZ

NeverHome2 wrote:
Tsk, tsk.... where do I start....

msmith1199 wrote:

It just needs clarification to the agencies enforcing it...

Who should do the clarification? The best people to clarify are the people who wrote the law. You are going to say that they may be all dead or out of office but that is exactly why the clarification should be in writing which means an amendment to the law which means the legislature should clarify in writing. So I guess we are in agreement?

msmith1199 wrote:
...and that clarification should be made public.

All laws are already public. I guess what you are saying is that the sticker will need to be changed when the law is amended in writing. Good idea...I agree.

msmith1199 wrote:
doesn't not

Double negative...enough said about that.

msmith1199 wrote:
...with a couple of possible exceptions.

No exceptions were noted in the law. Obviously they considered the law all inclusive so totorhomes should fall in one or other category. I guess there should be something in the law about totorhomes. I agree that the law need to be more specific. I guess we agree again... the law needs rewritten.

msmith1199 wrote:
...they only fall under the definition of "truck" if they are designed as used to haul cargo.

EVERYTHING hauls cargo. Now you need to define "cargo". Or maybe this need to be in the law...rewritten to include this definition? I think we agree again, the law needs to be rewritten.

I think we agree! :B

Laws can be clarified in a number of ways. The states Attorney General can issue a formal opinion on the matter. The courts could also rule on the matter. Or the administrative agency in charge of enforcing the law could also put out direction on it's enforcement and make it clear to both the public and their employees.

Yeah, typo on the double negative, so shoot me! :)

And "Truck" is very clearly defined under AZ law and I've already posted that someplace, not looking it up again.