Forum Discussion
mich800
Jan 29, 2015Explorer
SCVJeff wrote:DutchmenSport wrote:The FCC often has a very tough time making a reasonably technical case against a judge that simply doesnt understand the ramifications of the charges, and they are often reduced or tossed out, so they get what they can get. Doesn't really matter at this point, they've been found guilty of jamming, and that is a federal offence. The next time around wont be pretty for them at all.
Fine should have been much more...like a couple million.
At the end of the day there is nothing preventing them (Marriot or anyone else) from constructing screen rooms around any room or facility they choose and theres nothing the FCC could do about it because thats not considered jamming in their eyes and involves no active electronics. They dont oversee construction techniques.
That is so true. One of the reasons that white collar crime or fraud is often difficult to get a conviction. We have been involved in some pretty sophisticated frauds that are hard to understand if you are trained for it much less convince a jury how it happened.
About RV Must Haves
Have a product you cannot live without? Share it with the community!8,800 PostsLatest Activity: Apr 28, 2025