MPG Comparison Different Shapes

It is counter-intuitive but the back of the trailer actually has a large impact on MPG.

Something about the low pressure created by the flat back. This is why you're starting to see more and more cones on the back of semi trailers, it's not a gimmick but instead rocket science.

I think the extreme aerodynamics of the Ascape will help it pull easier, and net better mileage. Smaller engines are good mileage getters, until they have to work really hard. A lot will depend on the speed towed. At 55-60, the difference will be less, than 65-70.

JMO, but I'd take the roominess of the Taylor, rather than the mpg savings, and less interior height.

Not apples to apples, but a boat will tow easier than a higher front small TT, and get better mileage, due to the boat being much more aerodynamic.

Jerry

A lot comes into play regarding MPG when towing... One of the determining factors is the turbulence created just behind a tow vehicle. Sometimes the flat front trailers actually do a better job of breaking up the drag caused by turbulence from the tow vehicle.

All that being written, I've always believed that if I had to worry about the money I spend camping then I shouldn't be camping. The relaxation, quality family/friend time and sheer enjoyment of the outdoors far outweighs any cost.

My philosophy is to buy the biggest trailer you can afford and your truck has the capacity to tow and enjoy. I would hate to be stuck in a small trailer during a couple of days of bad weather...cabin fever kicks in pretty quick. The more room the better.

Your first link isn't working.