Taking Personal Responsibility to new lows.

westernrvparkowner wrote:
The reviewer gave no reason why they felt they had to be climbing on the hill...And people wonder why there has to be signs everywhere warning people if you do something stupid you might get hurt.

So I was intrigued and sought out the review...

First off in the "responsibility" category, why do you feel as if the reviewer owes anyone an explanation for being on the hill. Sounds to me like it was a part of their site. An attitude like this is just as bad as the one you're complaining about.

Secondly, where did it say that the hill was off limits and/or why imply that there was a sign to warn this person (or anyone else) about the danger of being on said hill? Its not like they stated that jumped over the fence, ignored the warning signs, and went on an authorized hike.

Moreover, it sounds to me like the reviewer was more concerned about the lack of a response from management in regards to the incident. Now I would agree that this would be a petty reason for writing such a review, but if you're looking to pick on reviewers for their supposed "lack of personal responsibility", then Amazon reviews are there to offer you months of entertainment.

On a related note, I slipped and fell on multiple occasions (didn't learn my lesson the first time) on some slicked algae-covered cross-ties at a campsite in the mountains a few years ago. I didn't write a review or complain to management, but a quick hit with a pressure washer would have solved the problem and lasted for several months. The next year we returned to the same site to find all the cross-ties had been replaced with new, clean lumber.