Trouble with California
Ag. Check points;we all know understand and tolerate them,never a problem. Couple of weeks ago we were heade to redwood. National forest from Grants Pas Oregon. Ag check ahead, ok I fall into line ...
Forum Discussion
qtla9111 wrote:
If they asked permission that is a signal you have the right to say "No".
The checkpoints are becoming more frequent, not just agriculture, and they are reaching further and further north.
There is a point to be made by some of the many freedom fighters when they ask, "How far is this going to go?" When are my rights violated?
As for immigration checkpoints as far north as 120 miles, what's the purpose? If the job was done properly at the border, then there wouldn't be an issue about who is in the country legally. Does that mean the U.S. needs a border wall? Could be. Spend less overseas and protect the continent I say.
We're accustomed to waiting up to five hours to cross a border bridge, then a two-hour wait to inspect the rv, people who ask silly questions like, "How is it possible you were born in the U.S.?" And after inspecting the rig, "Do you have anyone hidden inside?" It's all to try and throw you off.
There are signs posted that say you can turn around if you want before getting into the checkpoint. Good luck with that. You'll have weapons and vehicles pointed at you before you make the U-turn and you won't get away from there any time soon.
What does any of this have to do with an agricultural inspection point?
