2015 Ford 6.7L

fla-gypsy wrote:

azwildcat99 wrote:
...Prices

Or scale back the performance a bit too give a return of better fuel economy.

I agree, I don't need 800+ ftlbs of torque, but I sure wouldn't mind uber reliability or keeping some extra money in my pocket.

X2, is there really any benefit after 5-600 ft lbs of torque. They could build something smaller and cheaper with better economy and still sell just as many or maybe more.

Well I got 1650 ft lbs and its awesome

more is always better:B

SWD wrote:
I'll wait till 2016 or 17 till the bugs are worked out.

they've been saying that since 2003

azwildcat99 wrote:
...Prices

Or scale back the performance a bit too give a return of better fuel economy.

I agree, I don't need 800+ ftlbs of torque, but I sure wouldn't mind uber reliability or keeping some extra money in my pocket.

X2, is there really any benefit after 5-600 ft lbs of torque. They could build something smaller and cheaper with better economy and still sell just as many or maybe more.

azwildcat99 wrote:
...Prices

Or scale back the performance a bit too give a return of better fuel economy.

I agree, I don't need 800+ ftlbs of torque, but I sure wouldn't mind uber reliability or keeping some extra money in my pocket.

I need 800 lbs of torque. The more the better when towing heavy. I did not buy my truck for fuel economy. It would be nice to get a few extra miles per gallon, but I am very happy with my 6.7 Cummins. Solid engine with 800 lbs of torque. Might be a few extra with the cold air induction I put on. Ford needs to work on the looks for 2015. The dual wheel fender flares are not very appealing. Just my opinion.

azwildcat99 wrote:
...Prices

Or scale back the performance a bit too give a return of better fuel economy.

I agree, I don't need 800+ ftlbs of torque, but I sure wouldn't mind uber reliability or keeping some extra money in my pocket.

Just because it's there don't mean you have to use it. Also notice that he said when they designed it that they designed it to go through multiple power increases. TUNE IT UP! LOL! The tuners are going to have fun with this one. I think H&S has had it over 800hp and not blown it. We will be seeing 500 hp trucks before long WHOO HOO!!

N-Trouble wrote:
GIven where all three power levels are at today coming out of the factory the attempt to try to continue to one up each other in this area seems pointless. They should be focusing on reliability, fuel economy, and lower cost of ownership IMO...

I totally agree!

GIven where all three power levels are at today coming out of the factory the attempt to try to continue to one up each other in this area seems pointless. They should be focusing on reliability, fuel economy, and lower cost of ownership IMO...

azwildcat99 wrote:
...Prices

Or scale back the performance a bit too give a return of better fuel economy.

I agree, I don't need 800+ ftlbs of torque, but I sure wouldn't mind uber reliability or keeping some extra money in my pocket.

See right foot for fuel economy

Glad they listen to Joe public, that EB switch is a BIG plus for them.

...Prices

Or scale back the performance a bit too give a return of better fuel economy.

I agree, I don't need 800+ ftlbs of torque, but I sure wouldn't mind uber reliability or keeping some extra money in my pocket.