Forum Discussion
- KavoomExplorerDarn good mileage...
- MARK_VANDERBENTExplorerI want them to build a 3 row seat suv version of this . I have a feeling GM just may. Blazer comeback !!
- patriotgruntExplorer
MARK VANDERBENT wrote:
I want them to build a 3 row seat suv version of this . I have a feeling GM just may. Blazer comeback !!
Sounds like a winner. They'd sell like hotcakes. - 45RicochetExplorerWell it's got my V6 305 HP beat in mileage by about 7-8 miles per gallon.
Nice little trucks thou if that's all you need. Great behind the MH, great in the garage.
I still don't like the mirrors and the front spoiler is to low for some parking lot curbs. Just put the topper on yesterday, dog is happy.
I really think Ford and Ram are missing the boat in this arena.
OBTW ours cost about $13k less than his price quote. But ours is a pretty plain Jane model but it is 4x4. - Trailer life did a test on one these with the diesel in their latest edition and they complimented the engine pretty highly. Said they crested all the hills at 55 mph and they were pulling something like 22' trailer. Don't remember the weight of the trailer though.
- goducks10Explorer
Vintage465 wrote:
Trailer life did a test on one these with the diesel in their latest edition and they complimented the engine pretty highly. Said they crested all the hills at 55 mph and they were pulling something like 22' trailer. Don't remember the weight of the trailer though.
The trailer was a Lance 2155. 5047lbs as tested. 25'8"L, 10'1"H
16.3 towing. 22.6 combined. - King27ExplorerI gave one a test drive and although the mpg's look impressive here, I was not impressed driving it. It was not nearly as responsive as the V6. Granted, it was not really warmed up and diesels definitely perform better at operating temp's.
Maybe Ford will do better with their Ranger. FishOnOne wrote:
This little grocery getter gets a 31 mpg on a 100 mile test. Not too shabby. Don't know the towing/GCWR spec on these so I really don't know if it's a viable puller.
Link
I've looked at the Colorado / Canyon multiple times. Nice truck, but the seats suck.
There's a test drive article in the newest edition of Trailer Life - they said the same thing about the seats.
The forum for these truck has a huge thread of people complaining about the seats too.- Cummins12V98Explorer IIIThat's nuthin! I used to get 44 with my 81 VW Diesel PU. That's with a bed full of tools.
- larry_barnhartExplorer
deltabravo wrote:
FishOnOne wrote:
This little grocery getter gets a 31 mpg on a 100 mile test. Not too shabby. Don't know the towing/GCWR spec on these so I really don't know if it's a viable puller.
Link
I've looked at the Colorado / Canyon multiple times. Nice truck, but the seats suck.
There's a test drive article in the newest edition of Trailer Life - they said the same thing about the seats.
The forum for these truck has a huge thread of people complaining about the seats too.
Why is this story a true story or maybe it is the first seat made for a vehicle. Not really but sometimes it seems to be this way.
chevman
About Travel Trailer Group
44,029 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 13, 2025