brulaz wrote:
5 psi (250# upforce) is the baseline, zero lift with no WDH. Then with the WDH he adds another 5 psi (another 250#) before seeing any lift.
That's just an additional 250# upforce on the rear axle. With all the WDH upforce, I wouldn't expect much noticeable lift on a heavy TV handling a heavy tongue weight.
The approach seems reasonable to me. Adjust the WDH with the air bags un-inflated (or just inflated so no rear lift). To improve handling, add air until additional rear lift just barely noticeable. No?
RinconVTR wrote:
Last two posts....spot on.
The first of the "last two posts" is quoted above.
For something to be "spot on" the process needs to have a defined target.
Let assume the target of adjusting the WDH is to restore the front axle load to its unhitched value.
That typically leaves the rear of the TV 1-2" below its unhitched height.
A second target, after adjusting the WDH, seem to be to add enough air to the bags to "improve handling" withoug causing more than a "just barely noticible" amount of additional rear lift.
This second target presents a problem because nobody seems to be able or willing to say 1) how much air pressure is required to improve handling, and 2) how much additional rear lift will result.
If, in fact, enough pressure can be added to improve handling without giving noticible lift, this process will give the desired WDH objective.
If there
is noticible lift, then the WDH load transfer would be reduced.
If there
is no noticible lift, the air bags do nothing to reduce the amount of rear-end sag.
Pick your poison.
goducks10 wrote:
1st, load truck with no TT hitched.
2nd, air bags up to restore truck rear hgt.
3rd, hitch up TT.
4th, adjust WD to transfer needed weight.
5th, go camping.
This is the second of the two posts.
This process will reduce the amount of rear-end sag and will satisfy the WDH objective.
It also has potential for improving handling because sufficient load has been transferred to the air bags to cause a noticible amount of lift.
Ron