Forum Discussion

westkill's avatar
westkill
Explorer
Jul 24, 2017

Arctic fox: you should be ashamed of yourselves!

I have an 01 1150 model for the last few years
. Love the unit and have done repairs such as rebuilding the entire bunk area to fix the balsa wood, scotch tape and bubble gum the factory used. It no longer sags and rests on the roof of my truck. This year I tackled the giant belly under the slide out. I disassembled and removed the 2x3 they felt would support the entire weight of he slide,dinette and fridge. It now has a steel beam wth welded uprights going right to the roof. Even after this, the right rear still sagged and would Almost rest on my bed rails. Today I removed the lower 1\4" piece of plywood that slides along your wheel wells and was crushing to reveal not rot, not water damage or broken struts. The factory put absolutely NO framing there. There was nothing to keep the bottom of camper from crushing right up other than
N the. 1\4" plywood! In the pics you can see the water tank that was just bouncing around there with huge belly in between each of the 2 strts they put in.. there was NO insulation in the floor. So much for a 4 season camper! Where the rear sawhorse is is where the end f my truck bed is. The rest is overhang. .there is no structural support at all. A high school shop classs would frame it better.
I am adding a solid 2x10" in the open area going rearward. I have already framed in the area in front of the water tank and mounted that properly. Of course the rear was sagging, there's NO wood there! Needless to say my opinion of this manufacturer is zero! Look at he right front corner, they didn't even put wood on the corner!!!!!! Who the hell does that? So if you have a heavy camper with a big rear overhang this is why,absolute garbage construction and quality. Pics are below the next response

60 Replies

  • Troutguy wrote:
    jimh425 wrote:
    You are complaining about your 16/17 year old design?



    Looks like it held up pretty well for its age.......and the design. Let's hear it from all the Arctic Fox haters! You know who you are..........:R


    This is just plain nonsense. The OP has clearly pointed out serious design and construction flaws! These should never have occurred. Sadly the same sorts of sloppy work continue in the RV industry.
  • jimh425 wrote:
    You are complaining about your 16/17 year old design?



    Looks like it held up pretty well for its age.......and the design. Let's hear it from all the Arctic Fox haters! You know who you are..........:R
  • Good thing we can deal with it.
    I feel for folks who quit RV becouse they could not do the repairs.
    Than in Lance forum you will find few guys who spend in the range of $15k to have the camper professionally restored.
    Different strokes for different folks.
  • Yea under my full wall slide is now a 3" X1" "c" channel. That whole length is now arrow straight
  • I like metal, so going to HD I found aluminium 2x2 angle chanel for the outside and 1.5 x 1.5 steel chanel for the inside.
    Wood under the load always sag, unless you oversize it badly, what is not possible on camper.
  • Welcome to the club.
    At least you had 2x3 holding your slide.
    My dinette slide on Lance might be smaller, but all they put to hold it was 3/4 x 2 1/2 wood and stapled it to the front corner.
    All that when I bought Lance hoping for better quality after I saw front wall on my Fleetwood, where main horizontal beam holding the sides of 6500lb camper was 3/4 x 3 1/2
    Engineering on kindergarten level