dewey02 wrote:
Campfire Time wrote:
RoyF wrote:
Dewey02 and SoundGuy: You'r right; I got it backwards. Bluer lighting is marketed as "cool"; redder lighting is marketed as "warm". Of course, that is completely backwards to the physics (see Dewey02's chart).
Look again. The chart is in line with what the marketing is. It's also what photographers use when adjusting white balance manually in post processing of RAW digital files, cooler is more blue, warm is more red causing it to actually look more yellow.
Nope. I get what RoyF is saying: When comparing the Kelvin temperatures, the "cool" lights are actually warmer, the "warm" lights are actually cooler. Kind of counter-intuitive! :)
I wonder if that depends on who's marketing the lights? I didn't have any confusion when I bought ours.