Forum Discussion
- toedtoesExplorer III
Gdetrailer wrote:
toedtoes wrote:
boosTT wrote:
I wouldn't buy another non-smart tv. They will be obsolete eventually.
Not sure I get the logic of this. Everything will be "obsolete" eventually, especially in electronics. Should we never buy anything because it will be obsolete eventually?
Reminds me of my ex-BIL - he waited 10 years to buy a dSLR because every year there was some new advancement and he was afraid his purchase would be obsolete. During that 10 years, I was happily taking thousands of photos while he spent his time waiting... in the end, I improved my photo taking skills while his atrophied.
TVs and cameras, not the same thing.
I think what boosTT was getting at is the SMART part (which is your streaming lifeline) will eventually become obsolete when the MANUFACTURER of said smart TV decides they no longer wish to UPDATE the "SMART" portion of said TV..
Once that happens (and it DOES) your "smart" features will cease to work, leaving the TV a non smart TV that you paid a premium price for features no longer functioning..
There is no written laws that state the manufacturer must continue to update the smart functions. Streaming services are constantly changing and updating their software/security.. This means any manufacturer must also keep pace with those streaming services, if they don't you will no longer be able to use those services..
I have seen lots of Internet streaming devices over the years that have been abandoned by the manufacturer from streaming radio stations to streaming video.. It does happen and will continue to happen.
Personally, I am a fan of EXTERNAL devices so if the TV quits I can replace it with any TV.. And if the streaming device quits I can replace just the streaming device..
Buy a TV with better screen quality and not worry about the smart features.. And if you want streaming buy a external streaming device..
He stated that he would NOT buy a non-smart TV. So I think you've reversed his argument. - Johno02ExplorerIf you live in an area without decent internet service, a "Smart" TV is just as dumb as a non-smart one. If there is no internet, or wi-fi available, what use is a "smart" tv. What will one do more than a non-smart one, other than cost more??
- GdetrailerExplorer III
toedtoes wrote:
boosTT wrote:
I wouldn't buy another non-smart tv. They will be obsolete eventually.
Not sure I get the logic of this. Everything will be "obsolete" eventually, especially in electronics. Should we never buy anything because it will be obsolete eventually?
Reminds me of my ex-BIL - he waited 10 years to buy a dSLR because every year there was some new advancement and he was afraid his purchase would be obsolete. During that 10 years, I was happily taking thousands of photos while he spent his time waiting... in the end, I improved my photo taking skills while his atrophied.
TVs and cameras, not the same thing.
I think what boosTT was getting at is the SMART part (which is your streaming lifeline) will eventually become obsolete when the MANUFACTURER of said smart TV decides they no longer wish to UPDATE the "SMART" portion of said TV..
Once that happens (and it DOES) your "smart" features will cease to work, leaving the TV a non smart TV that you paid a premium price for features no longer functioning..
There is no written laws that state the manufacturer must continue to update the smart functions. Streaming services are constantly changing and updating their software/security.. This means any manufacturer must also keep pace with those streaming services, if they don't you will no longer be able to use those services..
I have seen lots of Internet streaming devices over the years that have been abandoned by the manufacturer from streaming radio stations to streaming video.. It does happen and will continue to happen.
Personally, I am a fan of EXTERNAL devices so if the TV quits I can replace it with any TV.. And if the streaming device quits I can replace just the streaming device..
Buy a TV with better screen quality and not worry about the smart features.. And if you want streaming buy a external streaming device.. - toedtoesExplorer III
boosTT wrote:
I wouldn't buy another non-smart tv. They will be obsolete eventually.
Not sure I get the logic of this. Everything will be "obsolete" eventually, especially in electronics. Should we never buy anything because it will be obsolete eventually?
Reminds me of my ex-BIL - he waited 10 years to buy a dSLR because every year there was some new advancement and he was afraid his purchase would be obsolete. During that 10 years, I was happily taking thousands of photos while he spent his time waiting... in the end, I improved my photo taking skills while his atrophied. - WalabyExplorer IIAmazon Firestick can make a dumb TV smarter than a Smart TV.
Mike - MACHZERExplorerThanks for all of the reply's!
Up north here WIFI is very spotty at best.
If the smart TV is all about ease of use but Wi-Fi dependent then for sure we would not get the benefits of a smart TV.
THANKS - boosTTExplorerI wouldn't buy another non-smart tv. They will be obsolete eventually.
- Cobra21Explorer
toedtoes wrote:
DutchmenSport wrote:
It's not the television that's the problem, it's the internet connection. We have a Panasonic (smart) TV in the family room of the house. Because of where we live, we have a line-of-site service, which requires a signal be sent from a cell tower.
Our Panasonic TV acted bad sometime, and the DVD/Blue Ray in the camper was really bad.
We took the plunge and beefed up our signal to a 10G which made all the difference in the world. No more pauses, freezes, or time-outs. Works great.
It's not the television, it's the internet service you're using that's causing problems.
Not necessarily true. I bought a Smart TV for the living room. It constantly was losing the signal, etc. When I bought the upstairs TV, I spent $200 less and bought a $39.99 Roku. Never had a problem. Ended up buying another Roku for the Smart TV. The roku on the smart TV is in the exact same place as the TV, yet it never loses signal. The roku upstairs is further away from the modem yet it never loses signal. The smart tv connections are the problem - they just aren't that great.
Full Agree, I am using Roku also, even on my smart TV. - Nicholsfamily05ExplorerWe have a smart tv in our new rig and love it.
We use our iPhones to crest hot spots as most camp grounds limit their wifi so you can stream and don't blame them for it.
We use the roko app and watch most of our shows. Works great through our wifi as long as we have a good service on our phones.
I'd say it's worth it. - toedtoesExplorer III
DutchmenSport wrote:
It's not the television that's the problem, it's the internet connection. We have a Panasonic (smart) TV in the family room of the house. Because of where we live, we have a line-of-site service, which requires a signal be sent from a cell tower.
Our Panasonic TV acted bad sometime, and the DVD/Blue Ray in the camper was really bad.
We took the plunge and beefed up our signal to a 10G which made all the difference in the world. No more pauses, freezes, or time-outs. Works great.
It's not the television, it's the internet service you're using that's causing problems.
Not necessarily true. I bought a Smart TV for the living room. It constantly was losing the signal, etc. When I bought the upstairs TV, I spent $200 less and bought a $39.99 Roku. Never had a problem. Ended up buying another Roku for the Smart TV. The roku on the smart TV is in the exact same place as the TV, yet it never loses signal. The roku upstairs is further away from the modem yet it never loses signal. The smart tv connections are the problem - they just aren't that great.
About Travel Trailer Group
44,027 PostsLatest Activity: Mar 05, 2025