Mike134 wrote:
ognend wrote:
Excuse me for ruining your day up there on the pedestal of towing Gods. Jeez.
Have to excuse him, he's got over 15,000 posts (average 5 a day) so he's "that guy" at the campground bar.
Yes, my apologies. Would it have made a difference if I just simply said “you don’t need it”?
Doubtful. That would have gathered the same crosswise reactions from all of those that believe you can’t leave the house without your wdh, virtually regardless of the type/size of trailer being pulled.
Fwiw, that “theory” lives almost exclusively with the RV crowd. Not sure why, but suspect inexperienced drivers and good RV salesman have a good part in it.
Furthermore, horse trailers in general are designed with the axles farther aft than say a typical TT or utility trailer. Why? To ensure adequate tongue weight on a “non adjustable” but variable load. Horses move around right? If they could move too far aft, they would create a bad towing situation.
But as I don’t agree with the “you need a wdh” for everything moniker, carry on.
Regardless, the stability control of the vehicle is not a good substitute for sway control, if it’s actually needed. It would tax the vehicle and/or trailers brake systems almost constantly with a trailer that was un-duly squirrelly.
Vehicle systems also work on a different premise. While anti sway hitches make it hard to turn or pivot on the stinger, resulting in a straighter pull, vehicle systems use brakes and throttle, mostly brakes, to yank a trailer back straight.
Proactive vs reactive systems is a good descriptor.
Again, sorry because y’all likely don’t want to hear this from me….