Drivers license requirements

I would test drive one, used to live in Ca, and then I would pull on the scale, explain to Cal Trans DOT Officer and they will measure and tell you what to do. I have been stooped in a Class 8 truck in Ca and they were right every time. Never got a ticket except for Fix-its.

To all that say the correct info is here or to call your state dmv. been there and done that. There is a hole in the info available. Fill that hole yourself at your own risk. I admit I am looking for a different reason. NJ specifically states no special license for a Motor Home. My question is a trailer in excess of 10,001 pounds behind a truck also in excess of 10,000 pounds, but teh total is under 26,000 pounds. No definitive answer. all the written info goes to whn the combo is over 26,000. Called DMV, they basically talked to us like were stupid, but they also didn't say page # or paragraph etc. In some places they mention medicals, in other they don't. I know that if I go over 26k I need a B unless the trailer is over 19K, then I need and A. That is pretty well spelled out. What is left blank is a 13K truck and a 12.5K trailer, total is 25.5K Anyone have an answer? Now I know that some state DO require a B license for this, PA being one, but they also require a B for a motor home. NJ silent. It is NJ I need to know about. Thank you.

I think it's the other way around. 12804.10 starts with "Notwithstanding any provision of law" before it says you can drive ANY motorhome under 40' without the class B. Notwithstanding means the same as "in spite of." So what 12804.10 is saying is basically in spite of any other law to the contrary, such as the weight limit law, a person can drive any motorhome under 40 feet without a Class B.

Completely agree but can also see there side. The stance was that when vehicle code starts with "notwithstanding any provision of law" that indicates that the provision that follows is limited by another provision. In this case they insisted that you then had to go back and find the limiting provision which is the weight. I can see both interpretations.

discovery4us wrote:
msmith I agree with your interpretation but, that dang but, when I researched with the CHP they hit me with the start of 12804.1, "Notwithstanding any other provision of law". They refered me back to 12804.9 which has the 26,000 lbs. and under requirement. Their stance was you had to meet all levels of 12804.9 not just one. They interpreted you had to check off each item to be legal with each license classification hence the "Notwithstanding any other provision of law". Meeting the under 40' was good but still had to meet the weight, not one or the other.

They were wrong. Go to 12804.10. It clearly states you can drive ANY motorhome under 40 feet with a Class C. This is a little used area of law and many cops may not be familiar with it. CHP should be, but even they can't know every law.

vegasfoodguy wrote:

"There is no Medical required for Non commercial class B."

If that's the case, I wonder why the California DMV sent me a notice telling me to get a new medical form filled out for my Class B Non-Commercial license? I had a routine appointment scheduled anyway, so I took the form to my doctor and he filled it out in a few seconds. No muss, no fuss.

You can be snarky and say the licensing requirements are a good reason to stay out of California, but think about it: I am trained, tested and medically certified to drive my 43-foot RV. I would worry a great deal more driving in a state where all you have to have is an automobile license and a pulse.

Pat in Menifee, CA

msmith I agree with your interpretation but, that dang but, when I researched with the CHP they hit me with the start of 12804.1, "Notwithstanding any other provision of law". They refered me back to 12804.9 which has the 26,000 lbs. and under requirement. Their stance was you had to meet all levels of 12804.9 not just one. They interpreted you had to check off each item to be legal with each license classification hence the "Notwithstanding any other provision of law". Meeting the under 40' was good but still had to meet the weight, not one or the other.

Whenever I try and post the text of the actual law it won't let me for some reason. There is some issue with copying the text here for some reason.

I was quoting from section 12804.9 which is a little murky. If I had just read the very next section, 12804.10 I would have seen it is very clear and in California you can drive ANY motorhome under 40 feet in length was a Class C.

2gypsies wrote:
For questions like this I don't understand why folks don't just go to the correct agency and ask. As we can see with all these answers.... everyone has different interpretations.

As do the agencies in CA. In my research the DMV, the CHP, and my local PD'S DOT division came up with different interpretations of the same written codes. From the point of view of each agency their interpretations were understandable, defensible, but not necessarily the same.