C-Leigh Racing wrote:
427435 wrote:
The 2000 F53 was rated at 310 hp, but still only had 4 threads in the heads for the spark plugs--------------which have been no problem for me.
Hummm, interesting. I thought I had read 2001 was when HP went to 310, I could be wrong though.
Anybody ever hear what all it was Ford did to the V10 engines to get the HP increase.
Neil
Which HP increase, the 275 to 305/310, or the 362?
The first was moderate tuning, what you can do with fuel and timing maps.
The bigger increase was was the 3-valve heads, which improved intake flow at the upper end, allowing torque curve to stay high a little bit longer. Basically a slight retuning of the high RPM side of the intake plumbing to shift that curve slightly up in RPM. You see the extra 50 HP from 4800 RPM to redline.
The real gain for motorhome applications was that the 3 valve head also improved the ram effect on the low RPM side of the intake, so there is a noticable increase in torque available right off idle.
In the 2-valve engine, one intake valve had to cover the whole RPM range, and had to be big enough for maximum flow. With two smaller intake valves, one can be used for low RPM, the second opened for high RPM, and the area of the opening around the two smaller valves is more than what was around the single larger intake valve.
FWIW, having variable-length intake manifolds, one for low RPM, one for high RPM, showed up in cars here in a 2.5 L Mazda V-6; dual-length tuning had been used in motorcycles earlier, usually on the exhaust side. Ford owned a majority share in Mazda, so it was easier to get the technology. Applying it to a truck engine, rather than a racing engine or a high performance engine for a sports car or sport sedan, we can give Ford credit for that idea.