Rambler Admiral vs Coachmen Mirada -- Advice
Looking for a Class A Bunkhouse... Provided the price, condition, mileage, and layout were roughly equal, if you were given the following choice, which would you take: 2007 Holiday Rambler Admir...
Forum Discussion
LVJ58 wrote:
Logic would dictate that a 2011 model would have a higher value than a 2006, kind of no brainer wouldn't you say...:h
Best regards and good luck with your choice....:)
Yes... when one has a higher value but they cost the same... Choosing the one that has the higher value would be a no brainer.... but I think that goes against what you are implying.
About the only one who gave any kind of explanation for their choice is Kiwi_too who says:
Kiwi_too wrote:
HR is a more solidly built coach. Can you look at both of them? Look a the systems, compare the inverter to the converter. Look at the slide, the woodwork (including hinges), the floor, the toilets, water bay, electric bay, etc. I think you will see the Marada as what is referred to as an entry level. The HR is built for comfort.
I did look over them.. and the water bay and electrical DID look more streamlined in the HR (Didn't have to plug the line into the generator plug for power, for instance -- auto switcher...), but other than that... the toilet was just a plastic toilet, in fact my wife felt that the bathroom wasn't as nice in the HR and there were no nightstands next to the bed in the HR... I just couldn't get a sense that the HR was THAT much nicer than the Coachmen.
I DID like the fact that the HR is on 22.5 wheels and has GREAT BIG outside storage, but that is about it. On the down side, the main slide on this unit seemed to come in unevenly and there was a "crunchy" noise when retracting it.
The Coachmen has larger flat screen TV mounted midship (instead of over the cockpit), MUCH sturdier booth table, fold out sofa bed with air mattress, and individual tvs in the bunks. In fact comparing the two, the only thing that I can *see* for HR over the Coachmen is the storage and the larger wheels (and of course the HR badge)... In almost every other category the Coachmen *seems* equal.
I am not saying that your opinions are wrong... I am just hoping that someone can educate me and expound on the statement that "HR is the better coach."
What MAKES it a *better* coach??
