Reliability of older Class C’s?

Tortiemctortiepants wrote:


I am considering a Class C for a cross country trip from VA to WA, but most that I am finding in my price range are older (1980s/90s/early 2000s)... Given low miles and no major current issues upon inspection, are these generally reliable enough to be trusted for a cross country trip? I am feeling the need to be extra careful as I will be traveling as a lone woman (not including the several pets along for the ride).

Are there any makes/models that have a particularly good reputation for longevity? Or conversely any that I should avoid?

Would it be better to absolutely find a newer model? And if so, from what year on would be best?

Thank you so much!! I welcome any and all advice!!

You don't state how much you want to spend or the length of the vehicle you are considering. '80's, '90's, '20's is a pretty wide range of years where the price can/will vary substantially. Condition is everything. Generally, the newer it is, the more reliable the vehicle will be, but that doesn't preclude buying an older vehicle if the price is right and it was well cared for and repaired in a timely/competent manner. If you lack the experience to determine that, hire someone who does before you buy. Be prepared to "walk away" from any deal that doesn't feel right. Take your time. The buyer is always in control. (until you give it up) RV's are complex vehicles. Expect things to break. They always do, so, be prepared.

That said, (flame suit on) IMO, an older popular Ford V-10 (E350, E450 chassis) isn't an issue (spark plugs) as long as they have been previously properly repaired. IMO, don't buy a longer (more than 24' in length) Class C on an E350 chassis, get one on the E450 chassis. Over time, . . . you'll be glad you did. If you need an RV longer than 28', consider a Class A. Much cheaper.

Chum lee