Actual Hitch Weight vs Dry Hitch Weight

Just to update. I bought a Passport 2810BH. I loaded it up with everything for camping last night, with the exception of a couple of food items. Here are my weights:

Claimed dry hitch weight: 565 lbs
Hitch weight when I got it home: ~620 lbs
Hitch weight loaded for camping: ~670 lbs

Gotcha! Should be able to make that work I would say.

I know the actual weight of truck with tools, running boards, etc. It's 5780. That leaves me 1120 for payload.

I plan on getting something under 6000 lbs.Looking at dry of 4500-5000. Hitch weight would be 690-750.

With 1100 lbs payload a 1000 lb hitch weight + 75 for the hitch will put you over the GVWR for sure, unless you camp alone or the others come in a separate vehicle. I tried that game with my ram with 1015 payload, by the time the truck was loaded for camping including the hitch I had 300 lbs of room under the GVWR. Either we pack way differently or you are not being honest with yourself about your expectations of the truck. Do you have running boards or a box cover? Those count too, a socket set under the back seat, it adds up quick. How many people do you camp with?

I will be right at GVWR with full TW (with about 1000 lbs of gear in the trailer). I'll be way under GCWR and under GAWR. With the new J2807 standard, Ram went up in payload (other 2 went down). Basically the same truck in 2015 went up 100-150 lbs on the payload.

You should not consider the WD hitch as effective in moving the weight to keep you under your GVWR of the truck. Realistically by the time you get a trailer that close, outfit it and hook it up, you will be over. Also they don't transfer as much weight to the trailer as you would think, and the longer the trailer, the less it will transfer. Use the transfer amount as your buffer, fill to GVWR and when you apply the WD it will move you ever so slightly away from it. My guess if you require your WD to get you by, you will not be under your GVWR. If you looking to just be close, over a bit is ok, then this becomes a moot point, just get what you like and don't worry about what me or him or anyone else says you should do.

In short 1100 pounds payload is not sufficient for RV towing. Your TV is marginal at best as it pertains to RV towing. In the end your selection of trailers will be limited.
Beware of the upgrade game. Starting out with a marginal TV sets up the scenario for continual upgrades to get it right. Upgrades are costly. Try to get it right the first time.

mfifield01 wrote:
I realize that. It will reduce tongue weight. The percentage is debatable (and will vary).

As others have correctly stated a WDH system DOES NOT CHANGE OR REDUCE THE TONGUE WT. It will however, change how much tongue wt. is carried by the TV. This change is the amount of TW that the WDH redistributes to the TT axles and thus it will increase the payload available for the TV by that same amount over not using a WDH system.

Larry

mfifield01 wrote:
I realize that. It will reduce tongue weight. The percentage is debatable (and will vary).

no tongue weight is tongue weight. A WD hitch does NOT repeat after me does NOT change tongue weight. A WD hitch shifts (moves) weight from the tv rear axle to the tv front axle and trailer axles. it does NOT change the tongue weight. If the rear axle weight goes down by say 1000lbs, then the tv front axle and trailer axles loads will go up by a combined 1000lbs. how much to each axles is dependent on the setup geometry, wheelbase of the TV, length and axle location of the trailer, bar lengths, and a few other things. somewhat hard to calculate, but easy to measure on a scale.

^^^^^^ by definition, it does not change tongue weight either. Tongue weight is whatever it is. We can measure tongue weight with the trailer sitting here in the driveway, and the truck in Timbuktu....and the TW is what it is.