Forum Discussion
Campfire_Time
Jun 11, 2015Explorer
Short answer to the OP is that yes, the Jack is better than the basic batwing. If all you have is the batwing right now, the Sensar add-on is $20 cheaper on Amazon, and that alone is a good reason to buy it. I don't think you'd be unhappy with either the Jack or the Sensar add-on though.
True the numbers don't lie. And yet at the end of the day, that's all that really matters to most RVers is more channels, isn't it? I see no reason to replace an existing Jack unless TV is REALLY important to you. And yes, I realize that to some folks it is. On the flip side, if one doesn't have either, the Sensar is certainly the better buy.
But realistically if someone has a Jack that isn't picking up more stations than the basic batwing, then there is another issue that needs to be fixed first.
SoundGuy wrote:
Actually one can, the common misunderstanding being that if one receives more stations with the Jack antenna than the Sensar IV then it obviously must be "better".
True the numbers don't lie. And yet at the end of the day, that's all that really matters to most RVers is more channels, isn't it? I see no reason to replace an existing Jack unless TV is REALLY important to you. And yes, I realize that to some folks it is. On the flip side, if one doesn't have either, the Sensar is certainly the better buy.
But realistically if someone has a Jack that isn't picking up more stations than the basic batwing, then there is another issue that needs to be fixed first.
About RV Tips & Tricks
Looking for advice before your next adventure? Look no further.25,106 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 27, 2025